Abstract
The Pacific Islands are estimated to have among the highest global burdens of hearing loss, however, hearing health services are limited throughout this region. The provision of hearing aid is desirable, but should be delivered in accordance with WHO recommendations of appropriate and locally sustainable services. Large-scale hearing aid donation programmes to the Pacific Islands raise ethical questions that challenge these recommendations.The aim of this paper is to consider the ethical implications of large-scale hearing aid donation programmes to Samoa, a nation of the Pacific Islands. Evaluation of both ‘Western’ and ‘Pacific Island’ perspectives reveals important cross-cultural differences regarding attitudes to donation programmes. We attempt to offer possible solutions that satisfy both ethical frameworks, and which should enable us to deliver an effective hearing health service for Samoa. These solutions may be translational and benefit other Pacific Island nations in a similar context.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference21 articles.
1. WHO . Who global estimates on prevalence of hearing loss, 2018. Available: https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/estimates/en/
2. Sustained benefits of hearing AIDS;Mulrow;J Speech Hear Res,1992
3. WHO . Preferred profile for hearing-aid technology suitable for low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: WHO, 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258721/9789241512961-eng.pdf;jsessionid=7F13A604E24EE80435463B49977A81DD?sequence=1
4. Understanding history, philanthropy and the role of who in provision of assistive technologies for hearing loss;Chadha;Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol,2014
5. Hearing assistive technologies in developing countries: background, achievements and challenges;McPherson;Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol,2014
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献