Abstract
Currently there is an inequity in transfer rates of uninsured patients versus their insured counterparts. While this may vary by hospital system, studies indicate that this is a national trend, especially in emergency situations, and represents a prioritisation of profits over ethical obligations. This creates a variety of ethical issues for patients and society that generates a concordance between deontological and utilitarian viewpoints, two generally opposed schools of thought. The prioritisation of profit maximisation in order to provide better care for a select population is insufficient to justify deleterious health outcomes, stress and financial burden on patients. Current policy regarding patient transfers in the emergency department is insufficient to protect the uninsured and must be reevaluated.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference25 articles.
1. Porter M , Lee T . The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard business review, 2013. Available: https://hbr.org/2013/10/the-strategy-that-will-fix-health-care [Accessed 4 Jan 2019].
2. Admit or Transfer? The Role of Insurance in High-Transfer-Rate Medical Conditions in the Emergency Department
3. Inappropriate Transfer of Patients With Orthopaedic Injuries to a Level I Trauma Center: A Prospective Study
4. The emergency medical treatment and active labor act (EMTALA): what it is and what it means for physicians;Zibulewsky;Proc,2001
5. The ethics of institutional transfers: emergency hand transfers in the context of EMTALA;Gowani;J Hand Surg Am,2016
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献