Imagination and idealism in the medical sciences of an ageing world

Author:

Farrelly Colin

Abstract

Imagination and idealism are particularly important creative epistemic virtues for the medical sciences if we hope to improve the health of the world’s ageing population. To date, imagination and idealism within the medical sciences have been dominated by a paradigm of disease control, a paradigm which has realised significant, but also limited, success. Disease control proved particularly successful in mitigating the early-life mortality risks from infectious diseases, but it has proved less successful when applied to the chronic diseases of late life (like cancer). The time is ripe for the emergence and prominence of a supplementary medical research paradigm, the paradigm of ‘healthy ageing’ which prioritises the goal of rate (of ageing) control rather than disease control. This is the difference between extending the human healthspan versus extending survival by managing (or trying to eliminate) the multi-morbidities, frailty and disability currently prevalent in late life. The idealism of the disease control paradigm is myopic because it ignores the health constraints imposed by the inborn ageing process itself, a biological reality which is already inflicting significant economic and disease burdens on the world’s ageing populations. Unless the medical sciences retard the rate of biological ageing, these problems will continue to be amplified as larger numbers of persons survive into late life.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference28 articles.

1. How healthy is the healthspan concept?;Kaeberlein;Geroscience,2018

2. Imagination and idealism in the medical sciences;Herter;J Am Med Assoc,1910

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Table 22: life expectancy at birth, at 65 years of age, and at 75 years of age, by race and sex: United States, selected years 1900–2007, 2010. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2010/022.pdf

4. The role of public health improvements in health advances: The twentieth-century United States

5. Pew Research Center, . May 2020, trust in medical scientists has grown in U.S., but mainly among Democrats https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/05/PS_2020.05.21_trust-in-scientists_REPORT.pdf (accessed April 20 2022).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Humility;Journal of Medical Ethics;2023-03-23

2. Geroscience and Public Health’s Plastic “Ecology of Ideas”;The Journals of Gerontology: Series A;2023-02-23

3. “Post-Protean” Public Health and the Geroscience Hypothesis;Aging and disease;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3