Abstract
Imagination and idealism are particularly important creative epistemic virtues for the medical sciences if we hope to improve the health of the world’s ageing population. To date, imagination and idealism within the medical sciences have been dominated by a paradigm of disease control, a paradigm which has realised significant, but also limited, success. Disease control proved particularly successful in mitigating the early-life mortality risks from infectious diseases, but it has proved less successful when applied to the chronic diseases of late life (like cancer). The time is ripe for the emergence and prominence of a supplementary medical research paradigm, the paradigm of ‘healthy ageing’ which prioritises the goal of rate (of ageing) control rather than disease control. This is the difference between extending the human healthspan versus extending survival by managing (or trying to eliminate) the multi-morbidities, frailty and disability currently prevalent in late life. The idealism of the disease control paradigm is myopic because it ignores the health constraints imposed by the inborn ageing process itself, a biological reality which is already inflicting significant economic and disease burdens on the world’s ageing populations. Unless the medical sciences retard the rate of biological ageing, these problems will continue to be amplified as larger numbers of persons survive into late life.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference28 articles.
1. How healthy is the healthspan concept?;Kaeberlein;Geroscience,2018
2. Imagination and idealism in the medical sciences;Herter;J Am Med Assoc,1910
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Table 22: life expectancy at birth, at 65 years of age, and at 75 years of age, by race and sex: United States, selected years 1900–2007, 2010. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2010/022.pdf
4. The role of public health improvements in health advances: The twentieth-century United States
5. Pew Research Center, . May 2020, trust in medical scientists has grown in U.S., but mainly among Democrats https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2020/05/PS_2020.05.21_trust-in-scientists_REPORT.pdf (accessed April 20 2022).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献