Abstract
Medical professionals often deny patients who inject opioids a second or third heart valve replacement, even if such a surgery is medically indicated. However, such a position is not well defended. As this paper demonstrates, the ethical literature on the topic too often fails to develop and apply an ethical lens to analyse the issue of multiple valve replacements. This paper addresses this lacuna by analysing the case of Mr Walsh, a composite case which protects the identity of any one patient, through the principlist approach of Beauchamp and Childress. It argues that the hospital should offer Mr Walsh, a second valve replacement because the procedure is: medically indicated, autonomously requested, non-maleficent, beneficent and does not violate a formal account of justice. The paper concludes with clinical ethical guidelines for valve surgery for patients with opioid use disorder.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference27 articles.
1. Debating medical utility, not futility: ethical dilemmas in treating critically ill people who use injection drugs;Baldassarri;J Law Med Ethics,2018
2. American Medical Association . Drug overdose epidemic worsened during COVID pandemic, 2021. Available: www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2020-12/issue-brief-increases-in-opioid-related-overdose.pdf [Accessed 22 Jun 2021].
3. Tissue Valve Is the Preferred Option for Patients Aged 60 and Older
4. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement
5. Call to Action
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献