Protecting privacy to protect mental health: the new ethical imperative

Author:

Aboujaoude EliasORCID

Abstract

Confidentiality is a central bioethical principle governing the provider–patient relationship. Dating back to Hippocrates, new laws have interpreted it for the age of precision medicine and electronic medical records. This is where the discussion of privacy and technology often ends in the scientific health literature when Internet-related technologies have made privacy a much more complex challenge with broad psychological and clinical implications. Beyond the recognised moral duty to protect patients’ health information, clinicians should now advocate a basic right to privacy as a means to safeguard psychological health. The article reviews empirical research into the functions of privacy, the implications for psychological development and the resigned sentiment taking hold regarding the ability to control personal data. The article concludes with a call for legislative, educational and research steps to readjust the equilibrium between the individual and ‘Big Data’.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference30 articles.

1. Singleton S . How Cookie-Gate Crumbles. Cato Institute. 2000 https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/how-cookiegate-crumbles (Accessed 11 Dec 2018).

2. Halpern S . Cambridge Analytica and the Perils of Psychographics. New Yorker, 2018. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/cambridge-analytica-and-the-perils-of-psychographics. (Accessed 11 Dec 2018).

3. Mosca D . Hacking the Internet of Things Just Got Easier: Computer Weekly, 2018. https://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Hacking-the-Internet-of-Things-just-got-easier-its-time-to-look-at-your-security. (Accessed 11 Dec 2018).

4. Meyer R . Anti-Surveillance Camouflage for Your Face: Atlantic, 2014. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/07/makeup/374929. (Accessed 11 Dec 2018).

5. Big data in psychology: Introduction to the special issue;Harlow;Psychol Methods,2016

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3