Case for improving respectful care: results from a cross-sectional survey of person-centred maternity care in rural South Africa

Author:

Doherty TanyaORCID,Horwood Christiane,Mapumulo Sphindile,Haskins Lyn,Manda Samuel,Penn-Kekana LovedayORCID,Luthuli Silondile,Filippi VeroniqueORCID

Abstract

IntroductionDespite a supportive policy environment, little attention has been paid to how to operationalise respectful maternity care in South Africa. This research provides a quantitative, baseline measure of women’s perceptions of person-centred maternity care (PCMC) to identify areas of focus for a participatory intervention with maternity teams.MethodsA facility-based cross-sectional survey of postpartum women within 9 weeks postdelivery in two rural districts of KwaZulu-Natal. 908 postpartum women were recruited from postnatal clinics and neonatal units in the district hospitals. The primary outcome was PCMC measured on 30 items with a 4-point Likert scale (0–3). Mixed-effects linear regression analysis was used to identify predictor variables that were significantly associated with PCMC.ResultsThe mean PCMC score was 55.5 (SD 13.6) out of 90 and was significantly higher for women who had caesarean deliveries compared with vaginal births (58.0 (SD 12.8) and 54.5 (SD 13.7), respectively). Around one-fifth of women reported verbal abuse at least once. Over half of women felt that their health information would be kept confidential all of the time, less than 15% of women were allowed to have a companion with them during labour or delivery and less than half of women felt they could completely trust their providers all of the time. Attending eight or more antenatal visits, having a caesarean delivery, being in the age group 30–45 and being in the middle wealth quintile were independently associated with a higher PCMC score while delivering at night was associated with a lower score.ConclusionWomen attending rural health facilities experience disrespect and lack of trust in an environment where they have little involvement in decisions about their care and feel unable to ask questions of their providers. These findings support the need for interventions addressing organisational cultures that allow disrespect within maternity units.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3