Impact of non-participation bias due to psychiatric illness on mortality and cardiovascular event estimates: a Danish longitudinal population study

Author:

Rygner ZerlinaORCID,Ellervik ChristinaORCID,Rasmussen Mads,Torp-Pedersen Christian,Poulsen Henrik E,Jørgensen AndersORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesThe impact of non-participation due to psychiatric illness on study outcomes in general population studies is insufficiently investigated. Here, we investigate the mental health bias in a population study and the potential impact on estimates of cardiovascular morbidity and overall survival.DesignData were retrieved from nationwide registries.SettingThe Danish General Suburban Population Study (GESUS), a cross-sectional community study conducted in Naestved Municipality, Denmark, from 2010 to 2013.Participants49 707 subjects invited to participate in GESUS.Main outcome measuresFactors related to non-participation were examined using multivariable logistic regression and time-to-event data using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOf 21 203 (43%) participants, 823 (3.9%) had a psychiatric diagnosis. Of 28 504 non-participants, 2453 (8.6%) had a psychiatric diagnosis (OR for non-participation 1.84 (95% CI 1.69 to 2.00)). The most under-represented psychiatric disorders in participants were organic mental disorders (5.76 (3.90 to 8.48)), substance abuse (3.12 (2.14 to 4.54)) and schizophrenia (3.12 (2.33 to 4.18)). Overall, more non-participants used psychotropic drugs than participants (1.26 (1.21 to 1.31)), and psychiatric non-participants had higher psychiatric hospital service utilisation than psychiatric participants. Compared with non-psychiatric participants in a 5-year follow-up, psychiatric non-participants had higher rates of cardiovascular events (HR 2.30 (2.07 to 2.56)) and all-cause mortality (3.37 (3.01 to 3.78)) than non-psychiatric non-participants (1.65 (1.48 to 1.83) and 2.26 (2.02 to 2.54), respectively) and psychiatric participants (1.39 (1.21 to 1.59) and 1.23 (1.05 to 1.44), respectively), pinteraction<0.0001 for both outcomes.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a considerable non-participation bias due to psychiatric illness in a general population health study, potentially leading to distorted estimates of somatic morbidity and mortality. Strategies for better-representing individuals with psychiatric illnesses in population health studies are needed.

Funder

Region Zealand Research Foundation

Naestved Hospital Foundation

The National Board of Health

The Local Government Denmark Foundation

TrygFonden

Johannes Fog's Foundation

Naestved Municipality

Johan and Lise Boserup Foundation

Region Sjælland

Naestved Hospital

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3