Abstract
BackgroundHip fracture patients (HFPs) frequently have multiple underlying conditions, necessitating that agreed-upon goals take these complications into consideration. Communication regarding goals between medical-personnel and patients is not always effective. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can outline personal goals and help promote quality health care in HFPs. Few studies have been published on this topic. The study’s aim was to outline the process of using PROs for goal-directed therapy among HFPs.MethodsThis sequential controlled trial was conducted among HFPs from two medical centres. The control and the intervention group received integrative rehabilitation. PROs were measured in both groups using the SF36 questionnaire three times postsurgery: 24–48 hours, 2 weeks and 3 months. During the first round of questioning, only the intervention group was asked ‘what matters most to you?’ during the rehabilitative process. Accordingly, agreed-upon goals that were determined by the SF36’s eight topics and were incorporated into the HFP’s rehabilitative process. A Likert scale of 1–5, ‘1’ indicating no-achievement and ‘5’ full-achievement, was used to assess the goal achievement 4–6 months post-fracture.Results84 HFPs participated in the study: 40 and 44 in the intervention and control group, respectively. In both groups, PROs declined after the HF, then improved somewhat 3 months later, but did not return to prefracture scores. Among the intervention group, 39% reached their specific goals (Likert level 5). Patients who achieved their goals had better PROs in comparison to others. The intervention group indicated PROs helped them articulate their desires and introduced them to new areas of care.ConclusionsShifting from asking ‘what’s the matter?’ to ‘what matters most to you?’ can improve the understanding of HFPs’ own priorities, promote quality outcomes and enhance patient-centred care. Using PROs as a guide for goal-directed therapy can create a more inclusive process that includes the patients’ most important health determinants and needs.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference68 articles.
1. The Israeli Ministry of Health . The national program for quality indicator: For general and geriatric hospital, psychiatric hospitals, mother and baby centers and emergency medical services (ambulances). Jerusalem, 2022.
2. Barnea R , Weiss Y , Abadi-Korek I , et al . The epidemiology and economic burden of hip fractures in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res 2018;7:38. doi:10.1186/s13584-018-0235-y
3. The Charlson Comorbidity Index Score as a Predictor of 30-Day Mortality After Hip Fracture Surgery
4. Handoll HH , Sherrington C , Mak JC . Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD001704. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub4
5. Crotty M , Unroe K , Cameron ID , et al . Rehabilitation interventions for improving physical and Psychosocial functioning after hip fracture in older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD007624. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007624.pub3