Developing a tool to measure enactment of complex quality improvement interventions in healthcare

Author:

MacEachern LaurenORCID,Ginsburg Liane R,Hoben MatthiasORCID,Doupe Malcolm,Wagg Adrian,Knopp-Sihota Jennifer A,Cranley Lisa,Song YutingORCID,Estabrooks Carole A,Berta Whitney

Abstract

Quality improvement (QI) projects are common in healthcare settings and often involve interdisciplinary teams working together towards a common goal. Many interventions and programmes have been introduced through research to convey QI skills and knowledge to healthcare workers, however, a few studies have attempted to differentiate between what individuals ‘learn’ or ‘know’ versus their capacity to apply their learnings in complex healthcare settings. Understanding and differentiating between delivery, receipt, and enactment of QI skills and knowledge is important because while enactment alone does not guarantee desired QI outcomes, it might be reasonably assumed that ‘better enactment’ is likely to lead to better outcomes. This paper describes the development, application and validation of a tool to measure enactment of core QI skills and knowledge of a complex QI intervention in a healthcare setting. Based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Model for Improvement, existing QI assessment tools, literature on enactment fidelity and our research protocols, 10 indicators related to core QI skills and knowledge were determined. Definitions and assessment criteria were tested and refined in five iterative cycles. Qualitative data from four QI teams in long-term care homes were used to test and validate the tool. The final measurement tool contains 10 QI indicators and a five-point scale. Inter-rater reliability ranged from good to excellent. Usability and acceptability among raters were considered high. This measurement tool assists in identifying strengths and weaknesses of a QI team and allows for targeted feedback on core QI components. The indicators developed in our tool and the approach to tool development may be useful in other health related contexts where similar data are collected.

Funder

Institute of Health Services and Policy Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference45 articles.

1. Bourn SS , Mackey KE , Redlener MD . Measuring, and improving quality. In: Cone DC , Brice JH , Delbridge TR , et al , eds. Emergency medical services. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2021: 432–45. doi:10.1002/9781119756279.ch113

2. Mapping a systems approach to existing healthcare design, delivery and improvement methods;Günay;Proc Des Soc,2021

3. Institute for healthcare improvement. the breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement; IHI innovation series [White paper]. Boston, USA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003. Available: http://www.ihi.org:80/resources/Pages/IHIWhitePapers/TheBreakthroughSeriesIHIsCollaborativeModelforAchievingBreakthroughImprovement.aspx [Accessed 29 Mar 2022].

4. Understanding the Components of Quality Improvement Collaboratives: A Systematic Literature Review

5. Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3