Abstract
ObjectivesObjective performance criteria (OPC) may serve as a tool to expedite the approval process and continue active surveillance of class III medical devices. Thus far, published guidance on the creation of OPC has been clinical area-specific. This study aimed to capture reflections from key stakeholders on the creation of OPC that may serve as a precursor for a formalized conceptual framework within the USA.DesignReflections from key stakeholders and guidance from an advisory committee were captured to gain an understanding of the elements that are crucial to the generation of OPC.SettingA non-probability sampling method using the purposive sampling strategy was employed to identify relevant stakeholders for engagement in semi-structured, open-ended, concept elicitation discussions.ParticipantsStakeholders involved in the generation of OPC.Main outcome measuresElements and themes regarding the priorities of, experiences with, roles within and perceived challenges associated with OPC creation captured through a phenomenological approach.ResultsA total of 27 participants were engaged to represent the following contributors: representatives of registries, health systems, health technology assessment bodies, clinicians, device application reviewers, payers, patients, patient representatives, patient caregivers, device manufacturers, data coordinators, data analysts and data informaticians. Consensus was achieved on the five core elements: (1) identification of medical devices, (2) engagement of key stakeholders, (3) selection of data source, (4) performance of appropriate statistical analyses and (5) reporting of findings. The engagement of key stakeholders (38%) was cited most frequently as the most important core element. Access to meaningful and high-quality data sources (47%) was the most frequently mentioned challenge.ConclusionsThe reflections from the participants identified five elements to be considered when generating an OPC within class III medical devices and may provide the needed foundation for the development of official guidance on OPC generation.
Funder
National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,Surgery
Reference25 articles.
1. 114th Congress . 21St century cures act, 2015. Available: https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ255/PLAW-114publ255.pdf
2. 115th Congress . FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017, 2017. Available: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-115hr2430enr/pdf/BILLS-115hr2430enr.pdf
3. Prosthetic Heart Valves: Objective Performance Criteria Versus Randomized Clinical Trial
4. Considerations and Recommendations for the Introduction of Objective Performance Criteria for Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve Device Approval
5. Hatfield L , Zusterzeel R , Daluwatte CNS . Improving access to medical devices: the use and evolution of objective performance criteria. health affairs Blog.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献