Using medical education as a tool to train doctors as social innovators

Author:

Khan NaginaORCID,Rogers AnneORCID,Melville ColinORCID,Shankar RohitORCID,Gilliar Wolfgang,Byrne Peter,Serafimov AlexORCID,Sira Mahalingappa Sridevi,Sehdev Simran,Sri AnnaORCID,Dave SubodhORCID

Abstract

IntroductionCurrent medical education prepares doctors to diagnose, assess and treat individual patients yet lacks the expectation to be responsible for the care of the wider community. Learning the skills to recognise and redress the social determinants of health are increasingly being recognised as an essential part of medical education.ObjectivesThe goal of this research was (1) to investigate how medical education can be leveraged to reduce health inequalities through the role and practice of doctors and (2) to elucidate how key innovations in medical education are a necessity that can support doctors as ‘change agents.’MethodsTwo international multidisciplinary roundtable focus groups with 23 healthcare leaders from various backgrounds were facilitated. The discussions were audiorecorded, transcribed and then thematically analysed with the qualitative analysis software QDA Miner.ResultsEight themes emerged: (1) Social innovation training in medical education; (2) Linking community working with social innovation; (3) Future curricula development; (4) Settings, context, environment and leaving the classroom; (5) Developing links with third sector organisations and community, including low-income and middle-income countries; (6) Including learners’ perspectives and lived experience; (7) Medical roles are political and need political support and (8) The need to address power imbalances and impact of discrimination.ConclusionsMedical education needs to fundamentally widen its focus from the individual doctor–patient relationship to the doctor–community relationship. Doctors’ training needs to help them become social innovators who can balance interventions with prevention, promote good health on a community and societal scale and tailor their treatments to the individuals’ contexts.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. World Health Organisation . World Health Organization - Social Determinants of Health, 2014. Available: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/

2. Mercer SW , Cawston PG , Bikker AP . Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8.doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-22

3. Health and social justice;Ruger;The Lancet,2004

4. Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice;Pantić;Education Inquiry,2015

5. Sen A . The idea of justice. Allen Lane & Harvard University Press, 2009. ISBN: 978-1-84614-147-8.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3