Author:
Moghadasi Setareh,Meeks Huong D,Vreeswijk Maaike PG,Janssen Linda AM,Borg Åke,Ehrencrona Hans,Paulsson-Karlsson Ylva,Wappenschmidt Barbara,Engel Christoph,Gehrig Andrea,Arnold Norbert,Hansen Thomas Van Overeem,Thomassen Mads,Jensen Uffe Birk,Kruse Torben A,Ejlertsen Bent,Gerdes Anne-Marie,Pedersen Inge Søkilde,Caputo Sandrine M,Couch Fergus,Hallberg Emily J,van den Ouweland Ans MW,Collée Margriet J,Teugels Erik,Adank Muriel A,van der Luijt Rob B,Mensenkamp Arjen R,Oosterwijk Jan C,Blok Marinus J,Janin Nicolas,Claes Kathleen BM,Tucker Kathy,Viassolo Valeria,Toland Amanda Ewart,Eccles Diana E,Devilee Peter,Van Asperen Christie J,Spurdle Amanda B,Goldgar David E,García Encarna Gómez
Abstract
BackgroundWe previously showed that the BRCA1 variant c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) was associated with an intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). This study aimed to assess these cancer risks for R1699Q carriers in a larger cohort, including follow-up of previously studied families, to further define cancer risks and to propose adjusted clinical management of female BRCA1*R1699Q carriers.MethodsData were collected from 129 BRCA1*R1699Q families ascertained internationally by ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium members. A modified segregation analysis was used to calculate BC and OC risks. Relative risks were calculated under both monogenic model and major gene plus polygenic model assumptions.ResultsIn this cohort the cumulative risk of BC and OC by age 70 years was 20% and 6%, respectively. The relative risk for developing cancer was higher when using a model that included the effects of both the R1699Q variant and a residual polygenic component compared with monogenic model (for BC 3.67 vs 2.83, and for OC 6.41 vs 5.83).ConclusionOur results confirm that BRCA1*R1699Q confers an intermediate risk for BC and OC. Breast surveillance for female carriers based on mammogram annually from age 40 is advised. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered based on family history.
Funder
Australian NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), research program Mosaic
Van de Kampfonds from Leiden University Medical Centre
French National Cancer Institute
Subject
Genetics(clinical),Genetics