A comparison of the accuracy of clinical decisions based on full-text articles and on journal abstracts alone: a study among residents in a tertiary care hospital-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparison of the accuracy of clinical decisions based on full-text articles and on journal abstracts alone: a study among residents in a tertiary care hospital

Published:2012-07-10 Issue:2 Volume:18 Page:48-53
ISSN:1356-5524
Container-title:Evidence Based Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Evid Based Med

Author:

Marcelo Alvin,Gavino Alex,Isip-Tan Iris Thiele,Apostol-Nicodemus Leilanie,Mesa-Gaerlan Faith Joan,Firaza Paul Nimrod,Faustorilla John Francis,Callaghan Fiona M,Fontelo Paul

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reporting Bias in the Form of Positive Spin Is Highly Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews on Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament;Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery;2024-07

2. The reporting quality and spin of randomized controlled trials of endometriosis pain: Methodological study based on CONSORT extension on abstracts;PLOS ONE;2024-05-02

3. Prepublication abstract-only reports compared with full-text manuscripts for randomised controlled trials in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review;BMJ Open Gastroenterology;2024-03

4. Evaluation of Spin in Systematic Reviews on the Use of Tendon Transfer for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears;Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery;2023-12

5. Evaluating the completeness of the reporting of abstracts since the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts: an evaluation of randomized controlled trial in ten nursing journals;Trials;2023-06-22