Externalist argument against medical assistance in dying for psychiatric illness

Author:

Maung Hane HtutORCID

Abstract

Medical assistance in dying, which includes voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide, is legally permissible in a number of jurisdictions, including the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and Canada. Although medical assistance in dying is most commonly provided for suffering associated with terminal somatic illness, some jurisdictions have also offered it for severe and irremediable psychiatric illness. Meanwhile, recent work in the philosophy of psychiatry has led to a renewed understanding of psychiatric illness that emphasises the role of the relation between the person and the external environment in the constitution of mental disorder. In this paper, I argue that this externalist approach to mental disorder highlights an ethical challenge to the practice of medical assistance in dying for psychiatric illness. At the level of the clinical assessment, externalism draws attention to potential social and environmental interventions that might have otherwise been overlooked by the standard approach to mental disorder, which may confound the judgement that there is no further reasonable alternative that could alleviate the person’s suffering. At the level of the wider society, externalism underscores how social prejudices and structural barriers that contribute to psychiatric illness constrain the affordances available to people and result in them seeking medical assistance in dying when they otherwise might not have had under better social conditions.

Funder

Leverhulme Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference45 articles.

1. Reasons for requesting medical assistance in dying;Wiebe;Can Fam Physician,2018

2. Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Annual report 2011. The Hague, 2012. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/uitspraken/jaarverslagen/2011/nl-en-du-fr/nl-en-du-fr/jaarverslag-2011

3. Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Annual report 2014. The Hague, 2015. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/uitspraken/jaarverslagen/2014/nl/nl/jaarverslag-2014

4. Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Annual report 2018. The Hague, 2019. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/uitspraken/jaarverslagen/2018/april/11/jaarverslag-2018

5. Regional Euthanasia Review Committees . Annual report 2020. The Hague, 2021. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/de-toetsingscommissies/uitspraken/jaarverslagen/2020/april/15/jaarverslag-2020

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3