Abstract
BackgroundAccurate recording of problems and diagnoses in health records is key to safe and effective patient care, yet it is often done poorly. Electronic health record systems vary in their functionality and ease of use, and are not optimally designed for easy recording and sharing of clinical information. There is a lack of professional consensus and guidance on how problems and diagnoses should be recorded.MethodsThe Professional Record Standards Body commissioned work led by the Royal College of Physicians Health Informatics Unit to carry out a literature review, draft guidance, carry out an online consultation and round table discussion, and produce a report including recommendations for systems. A patient workshop was held to explore patient preferences for mechanisms for sharing diagnosis information between primary and secondary care.ResultsConsensus was reached among medical specialties on key elements of diagnosis recording, and draft guidance was produced ready for piloting in a variety of care settings. Patients were keen for better ways for diagnosis information to be shared.DiscussionImproving the recording of diagnoses and problems will require a major effort of which the new guidance is only a part. The guidance needs to be embedded in training, and clinical systems need to have improved, standardised functionality. Front-line clinicians, specialist societies, clinical informaticians and patients need to be engaged in developing information models for diagnoses to support care and research, accessible via user-friendly interfaces.
Funder
THIS Institute
Professional Record Standards Body
Royal College of Physicians
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications
Reference30 articles.
1. Professional record standards body. diagnosis recording final report, 2019. Available: https://theprsb.org/standards/diagnosesrecording/ [Accessed 29 Oct 2019].
2. Survey of ICD-10 coding of hospital admissions in the UK due to recreational drug toxicity
3. Herrett E , Shah AD , Boggon R , et al . Completeness and diagnostic validity of recording acute myocardial infarction events in primary care, hospital care, disease registry, and national mortality records: cohort study. BMJ 2013;346:f2350.doi:10.1136/bmj.f2350
4. Department of Health,, Royal College of General Practitioners and British Medical Association . The Good Practice Guidelines for GP electronic patient records v4, 2011. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-good-practice-guidelines-for-gp-electronic-patient-records-version-4-2011 [Accessed 29 Oct 2019].
5. Simons SMJ , Cillessen FHJM , Hazelzet JA . Determinants of a successful problem list to support the implementation of the problem-oriented medical record according to recent literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16:102.doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0341-0
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献