Abstract
BackgroundDespite the availability of medical abortifacients, and their potential use in primary care, only a small proportion of primary healthcare professionals provide medical abortion services. Understanding the perspectives of primary care providers on delivering medical abortion is pertinent to identifying barriers to medical abortion service provision and increasing access for women globally.ObjectiveTo understand the knowledge, attitudes and practices of primary healthcare providers regarding medical abortion services.DesignFour databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus) were searched using search terms related to medical abortion and primary care. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools were used to appraise the methodological quality of studies included.ResultsSome 22 studies were identified, conducted across 15 countries, comprising 6072 participants. Study participants comprised doctors and residents (n=8), nurses and nursing students (n=5), and pharmacists (n=3) and six studies were conducted with mixed samples of providers. Medical abortion was deemed acceptable by some doctors, but fear of criminal prosecution, in countries where abortion is still restrictive, left doctors and nurses circumspect about providing medical abortion. Pharmacists referred women to other providers with only a small proportion dispensing medical abortifacients. General practitioners, nurses and trainees had mixed knowledge of medical abortion and emphasised the need for training on delivery of medical abortion and dissemination of guidelines. Conversely, pharmacists reported poor knowledge regarding medical abortion regimens and complications.ConclusionsIncreased dissemination of training and resources is pertinent to supporting primary care providers delivering medical abortion services and to increasing access for women on a global scale.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. Induced abortion;Cameron;Hum Reprod,2017
2. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends
3. Singh SDJ . Adding it up: costs and benefits of contraceptive services. New York, NY, USA: Guttmacher Institute and UNFPA, 2012.
4. Guttmacher Institute . Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access; 2018. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-worldwide-2017
5. World Health Organization (WHO) . Medical management of abortion (Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2018.