Abstract
BackgroundAttendance at post-abortion follow-up visits is poor, but little is known about factors affecting it.ObjectiveTo assess the factors associated with non-compliance with post-abortion services and to evaluate differences in rates of attendance and intrauterine device (IUD) insertion according to the type of service provision.Methods605 women undergoing a first trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) and planning to use intrauterine contraception were randomised into two groups. Women in the intervention group (n=306) were booked to have IUD insertion 1–4 weeks after the MTOP at the hospital providing the abortion, while women in the control group (n=299) were advised to contact their primary healthcare (PHC) centre for follow-up and IUD insertion.ResultsIn the intervention group, 21 (6.9%) women failed to attend the follow-up visit, whereas in the control group 67 (22.4%) women did not contact the PHC to schedule a follow-up (p<0.001). In both groups, non-attendance was associated with history of previous pregnancy and abortion. Not having an IUD inserted within 3 months was significantly more common in the control group (73.6% (n=220)) than in the intervention group (9.2% (n=28), p<0.001). In the intervention group, predictive factors for not having an IUD inserted were anxiety, history of pregnancy and abortion. However, we identified no significant predictive factors in the control group.ConclusionsFactors predicting low compliance with post-MTOP follow-up are few. Comprehensive provision of abortion care and post-abortion services seems beneficial for minimising the loss to follow-up and delay in initiation of effective contraception.Trial registration numberNCT01223521; Results.
Funder
Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto
Helsinki University Hospital Research funds
Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Routine Follow-up Visits After First-Trimester Induced Abortion
2. Attendance at post-abortal follow-up visits is low - can the risks of non-attendance be identified?
3. Working group set up by the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Current care guideline: termination of pregnancy: the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. 2013.
4. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. The care of women requesting induced abortion (evidence-based clinical guideline No. 7: Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, 2011.
5. World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd edn. Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献