Telemedicine medical abortion at home under 12 weeks’ gestation: a prospective observational cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Reynolds-Wright John JosephORCID,Johnstone Anne,McCabe Karen,Evans Emily,Cameron SharonORCID

Abstract

BackgroundIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, legislation and guidance were introduced in Scotland permitting medical abortion at home by telemedicine for pregnancies at less than 12 weeks’ gestation. Women had a telephone consultation with a clinician. Routine ultrasound was not performed. Medications and a low-sensitivity pregnancy test to confirm success of treatment were collected by or delivered to the woman, with telephone support provided as needed.MethodsA prospective cohort study of 663 women choosing medical abortion at home via the NHS Lothian telemedicine abortion service between 1 April and 9 July 2020. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were completed 4 and 14 days following treatment. Regional hospital databases were reviewed to verify abortion outcomes and complications within 6 weeks. Outcome measures included efficacy, complications and acceptability.ResultsAlmost all (642/663, 98.2%) the women were under 10 weeks’ gestation. For 522/663 (78.7%) women, gestation was determined using last menstrual period alone. Some 650/663 (98%) women had a complete abortion, 5 (0.8%) an ongoing pregnancy and 4 (0.6%) an incomplete abortion. No one was treated inadvertently beyond 12 weeks’ gestation, but one woman was never pregnant. One woman who had a pre-abortion ultrasound was later managed as a caesarean scar ectopic. There were two cases of haemorrhage and no severe infections. Some 123 (18.5%) women sought advice by telephone for a concern related to the abortion and 56 (8.4%) then attended a clinic for review. Most (628, 95%) women rated their care as very or somewhat acceptable.ConclusionsThis model of telemedicine abortion without routine ultrasound is safe, and has high efficacy and high acceptability among women.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Edinburgh Family Planning Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Reproductive Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . The care of women requesting induced abortion (Evidence-based clinical guideline number 7), 2011. Available: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/abortion-guideline_web_1.pdf [Accessed 4 Jun 2020].

2. Women's experiences of self-referral to an abortion service: qualitative study;Low;BMJ Sex Reprod Health,2021

3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Abortion care (NG140), 2019. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG140 [Accessed 4 Jun 2020].

4. Chief Medical Officer for Scotland . Abortion – Covid-19 – approval for mifepristone to be taken at home and other contingency measures, 2020. Available: https://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/cmo/CMO%282020%2909.pdf

5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and abortion care, 2020. Available: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/coronavirus-abortion/ [Accessed 30 Dec 2020].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3