Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures

Author:

Balane Marysol AstreaORCID,Palafox BenjaminORCID,Palileo-Villanueva Lia M,McKee MartinORCID,Balabanova Dina

Abstract

BackgroundPolicy is shaped and influenced by a diverse set of stakeholders at the global, national and local levels. While stakeholder analysis is a recognised practical tool to assess the positions and engagement of actors relevant to policy, few empirical studies provide details of how complex concepts such as power, interest and position are operationalised and assessed in these types of analyses. This study aims to address this gap by reviewing conceptual approaches underlying stakeholder analyses and by developing a framework that can be applied to policy implementation in low-and-middle income countries.MethodsThe framework was developed through a three-step process: a scoping review, peer review by health policy experts and the conduct of an analysis using key informant interviews and a consensus building exercise. Four characteristics were selected for inclusion: levels of knowledge, interest, power and position of stakeholders related to the policy.ResultThe framework development process highlighted the need to revisit how we assess the power of actors, a key issue in stakeholder analyses, and differentiate an actor’s potential power, based on resources, and whether they exercise it, based on the actions they take for or against a policy. Exploration of the intersections between characteristics of actors and their level of knowledge can determine interest, which in turn can affect stakeholder position on a policy, showing the importance of analysing these characteristics together. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches in implementation must also be incorporated in the analysis of policy actors, as there are differences in the type of knowledge, interest and sources of power among national, local and frontline stakeholders.ConclusionThe developed framework contributes to health policy research by offering a practical tool for analysing the characteristics of policy actors and tackling the intricacies of assessing complex concepts embedded in the conduct of stakeholder analyses.

Funder

Wellcome Trust/Newton Fund-MRC Humanities & Social Science Collaborative Award scheme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference49 articles.

1. Schmeer K . Stakeholder analysis guidelines, 2000. Available: https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33.pdf [Accessed 3 Mar 2019].

2. Howlett M , Ramesh M . Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. second ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2003.

3. Can policy analysis theories predict and inform policy change? Reflections on the battle for legal abortion in Indonesia

4. Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: a South African study of unintended policy outcomes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3