Abstract
BackgroundPolicy is shaped and influenced by a diverse set of stakeholders at the global, national and local levels. While stakeholder analysis is a recognised practical tool to assess the positions and engagement of actors relevant to policy, few empirical studies provide details of how complex concepts such as power, interest and position are operationalised and assessed in these types of analyses. This study aims to address this gap by reviewing conceptual approaches underlying stakeholder analyses and by developing a framework that can be applied to policy implementation in low-and-middle income countries.MethodsThe framework was developed through a three-step process: a scoping review, peer review by health policy experts and the conduct of an analysis using key informant interviews and a consensus building exercise. Four characteristics were selected for inclusion: levels of knowledge, interest, power and position of stakeholders related to the policy.ResultThe framework development process highlighted the need to revisit how we assess the power of actors, a key issue in stakeholder analyses, and differentiate an actor’s potential power, based on resources, and whether they exercise it, based on the actions they take for or against a policy. Exploration of the intersections between characteristics of actors and their level of knowledge can determine interest, which in turn can affect stakeholder position on a policy, showing the importance of analysing these characteristics together. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches in implementation must also be incorporated in the analysis of policy actors, as there are differences in the type of knowledge, interest and sources of power among national, local and frontline stakeholders.ConclusionThe developed framework contributes to health policy research by offering a practical tool for analysing the characteristics of policy actors and tackling the intricacies of assessing complex concepts embedded in the conduct of stakeholder analyses.
Funder
Wellcome Trust/Newton Fund-MRC Humanities & Social Science Collaborative Award scheme
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference49 articles.
1. Schmeer K . Stakeholder analysis guidelines, 2000. Available: https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33.pdf [Accessed 3 Mar 2019].
2. Howlett M , Ramesh M . Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. second ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2003.
3. Can policy analysis theories predict and inform policy change? Reflections on the battle for legal abortion in Indonesia
4. Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: a South African study of unintended policy outcomes
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献