A study of the quality of cardiovascular and diabetes medicines in Malang District, Indonesia, using exposure-based sampling

Author:

Dewi AksariORCID,Patel Anushka,Palagyi Anna,Praveen Devarsetty,Ihsan Bachtiar Rifai Pratita,Hariadini Ayuk Lawuningtyas,Lyrawati Diana,Sujarwoto SujarwotoORCID,Maharani Asri,Tampubolon Gindo,Jan Stephen,Pisani ElizabethORCID

Abstract

BackgroundThe WHO has warned that substandard and falsified medicines threaten health, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the magnitude of that threat for many medicines in different regions is not well described, and high-quality studies remain rare. Recent reviews of studies of cardiovascular and diabetes medicine quality recorded that 15.4% of cardiovascular and 6.8% of diabetes samples failed at least one quality test. Review authors warn that study quality was mixed. Because they did not record medicine volume, no study reflected the risk posed to patients.Methods and findingsWe investigated the quality of five medicines for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Malang district, East Java, Indonesia. Our sample frame, based on dispensing volumes by outlet and price category, included sampling from public and private providers and pharmacies and reflected the potential risk posed to patients. The content of active ingredient was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and compared with the labelled content. Dissolution testing was also performed.We collected a total of 204 samples: amlodipine (88); captopril (22); furosemide (21); glibenclamide (21) and simvastatin (52), comprising 83 different brands/products. All were manufactured in Indonesia, and all samples met specifications for both assay and dissolution. None was suspected of being falsified.ConclusionsWhile we cannot conclude that the prevalence of poor-quality medicines in Malang district is zero, our sampling method, which reflects likely exposure to specific brands and outlets, suggests that the risk to patients is very low; certainly nothing like the rates found in recent reviews of surveys in LMICs. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of sampling medicines based on likely exposure to specific products and underlines the dangers of extrapolating results across countries.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference36 articles.

1. World Health Organization . WHO global surveillance and monitoring system for substandard and falsified medical products. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513425

2. World Health Organization . A study on the public health and socioeconomic impact of substandard and falsified medical products. Geneva: WHO, 2017. http://who.int/medicines/regulation/ssffc/publications/Layout-SEstudy-WEB.pdf

3. World Health Organization . 1 in 10 medical products in developing countries is substandard or falsified. World Health Organization, 2017. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2017-1-in-10-medical-products-in-developing-countries-is-substandard-or-falsified

4. Guidelines for Field Surveys of the Quality of Medicines: A Proposal

5. Substandard and counterfeit medicines: a systematic review of the literature

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3