The magnitude and determinants of violence against healthcare workers in Pakistan

Author:

Shaikh Shiraz,Baig Lubna Ansari,Hashmi Ibrahim,Khan Mirwais,Jamali Seemin,Khan Muhammad Naseem,Saleemi Munir Akhtar,Zulfiqar Komal,Ehsan Sumera,Yasir Iram,Haq Zia ul,Mazharullah Lubna,Zaib Samina

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine the magnitude and determinants of violence against healthcare workers (HCWs) and to identify the predominant types and causes of violence experienced by them.MethodologyA cross-sectional survey based on structured questionnaire adopted from previous surveys and qualitative data was conducted in 4 large cities and 12 districts in 3 provinces of Pakistan. The survey covered 8579 from all cadres of HCWs, including doctors, nurses, technicians, support staff, ambulance workers, vaccinators, lady health visitors, midwives and lady health workers (LHWs). The predictors of overall violence experienced, physical violence experienced and verbal violence experienced were separately analysed for tertiary care hospitals, secondary care hospitals, primary care hospitals and field-level HCWs. Logistic regression was used to compute adjusted ORs with 95% CIs for the association of different factors with the violence experienced.ResultsMore than one-third (38.4%) reported having experienced any form of violence in the last 6 months. Verbal violence was the most commonly experienced form (33.9%), followed by physical violence (6.6%). The main reasons for physical violence were death of patients (17.6%), serious condition of patients (16.6%) and delay in care (13.4%). Among the different types of field HCWs, emergency vehicle operators were significantly more likely to experience verbal violence compared with LHWs (adjusted OR=1.97; 95% CI 1.31 to 2.94; p=0.001). Among hospital HCWs, those working in private hospitals were significantly less likely to experience physical violence (adjusted OR=0.52; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.71; p=0.001) and verbal violence (adjusted OR=0.57; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.68; p=0.001).ConclusionViolence against HCWs exists in various forms among all cadres and at different levels of care. The gaps in capacity, resources and policies are evident. Specific strategies need to be adopted for different types of HCWs to protect them against violence.*The study was conducted under the framework of ICRC’s Healthcare in Danger Initiative for protection of healthcare against Violence

Funder

International Committee of Red Cross

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference37 articles.

1. WHO document . World report on violence and health. Available: www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/

2. Health policy and Economic Research Unit, British Medical Association . Violence at work: the experience of UK doctors. London: BMA house, 2003.

3. Conseil international des infirmières . Guidelines on coping with violence in the workplace. Geneva: International Council of Nurses, 1999.

4. World Health Organization . Violence: a public health priority. global consultation on violence and health, 1996.

5. Al-Omari H . Physical and verbal workplace violence against nurses in Jordan. IntNurs Rev 2015.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3