Bargaining and gendered authority: a framework to understand household decision-making about childhood vaccines in the Philippines

Author:

Wachinger JonasORCID,Reñosa Mark Donald CORCID,Endoma VivienneORCID,Aligato Mila FORCID,Landicho-Guevarra JhoysORCID,Landicho JenifferORCID,Bravo Thea AndreaORCID,McMahon Shannon AORCID

Abstract

IntroductionTargeted vaccination promotion efforts aimed at building vaccine confidence require an in-depth understanding of how and by whom decisions about vaccinating children are made. While several studies have highlighted how parents interact with other stakeholders when discussing childhood vaccination, less is known about the way in which vaccination uptake is negotiated within households.MethodsWe conducted 44 in-depth interviews with caregivers of children under five in the Philippines who had delayed or refused vaccination. Interviews were conducted between August 2020 and March 2021 and were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Notions of intra-household vaccination bargaining emerged early during systematic debriefings and were probed more pointedly throughout data collection.ResultsParents as well as paternal and maternal families proved to be dominant stakeholders in intra-household bargaining for childhood vaccination. Although bargaining among these stakeholders was based on engrained, gender-based power imbalances, disadvantaged stakeholders could draw on a range of interrelated sources of bargaining power to nevertheless shape decision-making. Sources of bargaining power included, in descending order of their relevance for vaccination, (1) physical presence at the household (at the time of vaccination decision-making), (2) interest in the topic of vaccination and conviction of one’s own position, (3) previous vaccination and caregiving experience, and (4) access to household resources (including finances). The degree to which each household member could draw on these sources of bargaining power varied considerably over time and across households.ConclusionOur findings highlight how bargaining due to intra-household disagreement coins decisions regarding childhood vaccination. Considering the risks for public health associated with vaccine hesitancy globally, we advocate for acknowledging intra-household dynamics in research and practice, such as by purposefully targeting household members with decision-making capacity in vaccination promotion efforts, aligning promotion efforts with available bargaining capacity or further empowering those convinced of vaccination.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference71 articles.

1. WHO . Ten threats to global health in 2019, 2019. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019 [Accessed 14 Sep 2022].

2. Vaccine hesitancy: causes, consequences, and a call to action;Salmon;Vaccine,2015

3. Vaccine hesitancy

4. Vaccine hesitancy - a potential threat to the achievements of vaccination programmes in Africa;Cooper;Hum Vaccin Immunother,2018

5. A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents' vaccination decision-making in the United Kingdom;Forster;SSM Popul Health,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3