Scaling up of safety and quality improvement interventions in perioperative care: a systematic scoping review of implementation strategies and effectiveness

Author:

White Michelle CORCID,Ahuja ShaliniORCID,Peven Kimberly,McLean Susanna Ritchie,Hadi Dina,Okonkwo Ijeoma,Clancy Olivia,Turner Maryann,Henry Jaymie Claire AngORCID,Sevdalis Nick

Abstract

BackgroundGlobally, 5 billion people lack access to safe surgical care with more deaths due to lack of quality care rather than lack of access. While many proven quality improvement (QI) interventions exist in high-income countries, implementing them in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) faces further challenges. Currently, theory-driven, systematically articulated knowledge of the factors that support successful scale-up of QI in perioperative care in these settings is lacking. We aimed to identify all perioperative safety and QI interventions applied at scale in LMICs and evaluate their implementation mechanisms using implementation theory.MethodsSystematic scoping review of perioperative QI interventions in LMICs from 1960 to 2020. Studies were identified through Medline, EMBASE and Google Scholar. Data were extracted in two phases: (1) abstract review to identify the range of QI interventions; (2) studies describing scale-up (three or more sites), had full texts retrieved and analysed for; implementation strategies and scale-up frameworks used; and implementation outcomes reported.ResultsWe screened 45 128 articles, identifying 137 studies describing perioperative QI interventions across 47 countries. Only 31 of 137 (23%) articles reported scale-up with the most common intervention being the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. The most common implementation strategies were training and educating stakeholders, developing stakeholder relationships, and using evaluative and iterative strategies. Reporting of implementation mechanisms was generally poor; and although the components of scale-up frameworks were reported, relevant frameworks were rarely referenced.ConclusionMany studies report implementation of QI interventions, but few report successful scale-up from single to multiple-site implementation. Greater use of implementation science methodology may help determine what works, where and why, thereby aiding more widespread scale-up and dissemination of perioperative QI interventions.

Funder

UK Government

King’s College London

Global Health Research Unit on Health System Strengthening

NIHR

National Institute of Health

King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Applied Research Collaboration

National Institute for Health Research

Kings College London

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference69 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine . (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. In: Kohn LT , Corrigan JM , Donaldson MS , eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2000.

2. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution

3. Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery;Howell;Ann Surg,2014

4. Change in Adverse Events After Enrollment in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

5. The Science of Large-Scale Change in Global Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3