Author:
Bae Crystal,Pigoga Jennifer L,Cox Megan,Hollong Bonaventure,Kalanzi Joseph,Abbas Gamal,Wallis Lee A,Calvello Hynes Emilie J
Abstract
Healthcare facilities in low-income and middle-income countries lack an objective measurement tool to assess emergency care capacity. The African Federation for Emergency Medicine developed the Emergency Care Assessment Tool (ECAT) to fulfil this function. The ECAT assesses the provision of key medical interventions (signal functions) that emergency units (EUs) should be able to perform to adequately treat six common, life-threatening conditions (sentinel conditions). We describe the piloting and refinement of the ECAT, to improve usability and context-appropriateness. We undertook iterative, multisite refinement of the ECAT. After pilot testing at a South African referral hospital, subsequent studies occurred at district, regional and central facilities across four countries representing the major regions of Africa: Cameroon, Uganda, Egypt and Botswana. At each site, the tool was administered to three participants: one senior physician, one senior nurse and one other clinical provider. Feedback informed refinements of the ECAT, and an updated tool was used in the next-studied country. Iteratively implementing refined versions of the tool in various contexts across Africa resulted in a final ECAT that uses signal functions, categorised by sentinel conditions and evaluated against discrete barriers to emergency care service delivery, to assess EUs. It also allowed for refinement of administration and data analysis processes. The ECAT has a total of 71 items. Advanced facilities are expected to perform all 71 signal functions, while intermediate facilities should be able to perform 53. The ECAT is the first tool to provide a standardised method for assessing facility-based emergency care in the African context. It identifies where in the maturation process a hospital or system is and what gaps exist in delivery of care, so that a comprehensive roadmap for development can be established. Although validity and feasibility testing have now occurred, reliability studies must be conducted prior to amplification across the region.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference25 articles.
1. Resolution WHA 60.22. Emergency-care systems. Resolution WHA 60.22: Geneva, 2007.
2. Thind A , Hsia R , Mabweijano J , et al . Prehospital and Emergency Care. In: Debas HT , Donkor P , Gawande A , et al , eds. Essential Surgery: Disease Control Priorities. Third Edition. Washington, DC: Prehospital and Emergency Care, 2015.
3. Operationalising emergency care delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: consensus-based recommendations for healthcare facilities
4. Essential surgery: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition
5. Chavula C , Pigoga JL , Kafwamfwa M . A cross-sectional evaluation of emergency care capacity at public hospitals in Zambia 2018. [Unpublished].
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献