Stuck in the middle: a systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016

Author:

Hedt-Gauthier Bethany LORCID,Jeufack Herve Momo,Neufeld Nicholas H,Alem Atalay,Sauer Sara,Odhiambo Jackline,Boum YapORCID,Shuchman Miriam,Volmink Jimmy

Abstract

BackgroundCollaborations are often a cornerstone of global health research. Power dynamics can shape if and how local researchers are included in manuscripts. This article investigates how international collaborations affect the representation of local authors, overall and in first and last author positions, in African health research.MethodsWe extracted papers on ‘health’ in sub-Saharan Africa indexed in PubMed and published between 2014 and 2016. The author’s affiliation was used to classify the individual as from the country of the paper’s focus, from another African country, from Europe, from the USA/Canada or from another locale. Authors classified as from the USA/Canada were further subclassified if the author was from a top US university. In primary analyses, individuals with multiple affiliations were presumed to be from a high-income country if they contained any affiliation from a high-income country. In sensitivity analyses, these individuals were presumed to be from an African country if they contained any affiliation an African country. Differences in paper characteristics and representation of local coauthors are compared by collaborative type using χ² tests.ResultsOf the 7100 articles identified, 68.3% included collaborators from the USA, Canada, Europe and/or another African country. 54.0% of all 43 429 authors and 52.9% of 7100 first authors were from the country of the paper’s focus. Representation dropped if any collaborators were from USA, Canada or Europe with the lowest representation for collaborators from top US universities—for these papers, 41.3% of all authors and 23.0% of first authors were from country of paper’s focus. Local representation was highest with collaborators from another African country. 13.5% of all papers had no local coauthors.DiscussionIndividuals, institutions and funders from high-income countries should challenge persistent power differentials in global health research. South-South collaborations can help African researchers expand technical expertise while maintaining presence on the resulting research.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. World Bank Group . A decade of development in sub-Saharan African science, technology, engineering & mathematics research. Elsevier, 2014.

2. Simpkin V , Namubiru-Mwaura E , Clarke L , et al . Investing in health R&D: where we are, what limits us, and how to make progress in Africa. BMJ Glob Health 2019;4.doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001047

3. Konde V . Towards achieving the African Union's recommendation of expenditure of 1% of GDP on research and development. ECA policy brief, No. ECA/18/004. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 2018.

4. Viergever RF . The mismatch between the health research and development (R&D) that is needed and the R&D that is undertaken: an overview of the problem, the causes, and solutions. Glob Health Action 2013;6:22450.doi:10.3402/gha.v6i0.22450

5. Patterns of co-authorship in international epidemiology

Cited by 185 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3