Abstract
IntroductionOne of the ultimate goals of strengthening the health system is to achieve health equity. Vietnam is considered one of the ‘fast-track countries’ to achieve the health-related Millennium Development Goals, but research on its equity strategies remains inadequate.MethodsUsing Vietnamese official health statistics, we investigated inequity in four dimensions including health resources, service delivery, service utilisation and residents’ health status from the perspectives of income levels, poverty rates and subnational regions. The Slope Index of Inequality, concentration curve/Concentration Index, absolute difference and Theil Index were used.ResultsFour indicators showed ‘pro-poor’ inequality in health resources, including the per capita health budget, per capita health personnel, per capita health personnel at the community level and per capita hospital beds at the community level, while provincial hospital beds showed ‘pro-rich’ inequality. Two health service delivery indicators (delivery of antenatal care ≥3 times and proportion of community health service centres with medical doctors) show ‘pro-rich’ inequality, although two health status indicators, mortality and malnutrition rates for children under five, showed ‘pro-poor’ inequality. The Northern Midlands and Mountain Areas, and the Central Highlands were disadvantaged regarding service delivery and health status. Intraregional differences were the main factors contributing to the inequalities in delivery of antenatal care ≥3 times, provincial hospital beds and percentage of community health centres with medical doctors, with the Red River Delta and the South East region experiencing the greatest inequalities.ConclusionThe overall level of health equity in Vietnam has increased over the past decade, although inequality in health service delivery has hindered progress towards health equity based on income, poverty and subnational regions. Targeted policies need to be introduced to reduce inequities relating to the health workforce and service delivery capacity.
Funder
National Science and Technology Project on Development Assistance for Technology: Developing China-ASEAN Public Health Research and Development Collaborating Center
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Reference44 articles.
1. Universal health coverage is a matter of equity, rights, and justice;Cuevas Barron;Lancet Glob Health,2023
2. Assessing the burden of COVID-19 in developing countries: systematic review, meta-analysis and public policy implications;Levin;BMJ Glob Health,2022
3. World Health Organization . Handbook on health inequality monitoring with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. Available: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/85345
4. Why reduce health inequalities?
5. Kelsall T , Hart T , Laws E . Political settlements and pathways to universal health coverage. ODI Working Paper 2016.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献