Evaluation of the Global Health Security Index as a predictor of COVID-19 excess mortality standardised for under-reporting and age structure

Author:

Ledesma Jorge Ricardo,Isaac Christopher R,Dowell Scott F,Blazes David L,Essix Gabrielle V,Budeski Katherine,Bell Jessica,Nuzzo Jennifer B

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies have observed that countries with the strongest levels of pandemic preparedness capacities experience the greatest levels of COVID-19 burden. However, these analyses have been limited by cross-country differentials in surveillance system quality and demographics. Here, we address limitations of previous comparisons by exploring country-level relationships between pandemic preparedness measures and comparative mortality ratios (CMRs), a form of indirect age standardisation, of excess COVID-19 mortality.MethodsWe indirectly age standardised excess COVID-19 mortality, from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation modelling database, by comparing observed total excess mortality to an expected age-specific COVID-19 mortality rate from a reference country to derive CMRs. We then linked CMRs with data on country-level measures of pandemic preparedness from the Global Health Security (GHS) Index. These data were used as input into multivariable linear regression analyses that included income as a covariate and adjusted for multiple comparisons. We conducted a sensitivity analysis using excess mortality estimates from WHO and The Economist.ResultsThe GHS Index was negatively associated with excess COVID-19 CMRs (β= −0.21, 95% CI=−0.33, −0.10). Greater capacities related to prevention (β= −0.11, 95% CI= −0.20 to −0.03), detection (β=−0.09, 95% CI= −0.17 to −0.02), response (β = −0.19, 95% CI= −0.32 to −0.05), international commitments (β= −0.17, 95% CI= −0.30 to −0.04) and risk environments (β= −0.30, 95% CI= −0.42 to −0.18) were each associated with lower CMRs. After adjustment for multiple hypotheses, the GHS Index (table 2; β= −0.21, adjusted 95% CI=−0.41, −0.02) and risk environment (β= −0.30, adjusted 95% CI=−0.50, −0.10) remained associated with excess deaths. Results were not replicated using excess mortality models that rely more heavily on reported COVID-19 deaths (eg, WHO and The Economist).ConclusionThe first direct comparison of COVID-19 excess mortality rates across countries accounting for under-reporting and age structure confirms that greater levels of preparedness were associated with lower excess COVID-19 mortality. Additional research is needed to confirm these relationships as more robust national-level data on COVID-19 impact become available.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3