Abstract
IntroductionWealth-related inequalities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health have been widely studied by dividing the population into quintiles. We present a comprehensive analysis of wealth inequalities for the composite coverage index (CCI) using national health surveys carried out since 2010, using wealth deciles and absolute income estimates as stratification variables, and show how these new approaches expand on traditional equity analyses.Methods83 low-income and middle-income countries were studied. The CCI is a combined measure of coverage with eight key reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health interventions. It was disaggregated by wealth deciles for visual inspection of inequalities, and the slope index of inequality (SII) was estimated. The correlation between coverage in the extreme deciles and SII was assessed. Finally, we used multilevel models to examine how the CCI varies according to the estimated absolute income for each wealth quintile in the surveys.ResultsThe analyses of coverage by wealth deciles and by absolute income show that inequality is mostly driven by coverage among the poor, which is much more variable than coverage among the rich across countries. Regardless of national coverage, in 61 of the countries, the wealthiest decile achieved 70% or higher CCI coverage. Well-performing countries were particularly effective in achieving high coverage among the poor. In contrast, underperforming countries failed to reach the poorest, despite reaching the better-off.ConclusionThere are huge inequalities between the richest and the poorest women and children in most countries. These inequalities are strongly driven by low coverage among the poorest given the wealthiest groups achieve high coverage irrespective of where they live, overcoming any barriers that are an impediment to others. Countries that ‘punched above their weight’ in coverage, given their level of absolute wealth, were those that best managed to reach their poorest women and children.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Wellcome
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference23 articles.
1. Gwatkin DR , Rutstein S , Johnson K , et al . Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries : an overview. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2007. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/962091468332070548/pdf/483610WP0Socio10Box338901B01PUBLIC1.pdf
2. Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough
3. Wong KLM , Restrepo-Méndez MC , Barros AJD , et al . Socioeconomic inequalities in skilled birth attendance and child stunting in selected low and middle income countries: wealth Quintiles or deciles? PLoS One 2017;12:e0174823.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174823
4. Measuring socioeconomic inequalities with predicted absolute incomes rather than wealth Quintiles: a comparative assessment using child stunting data from national surveys;Fink;Am J Public Health,2017
5. Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 Countdown countries
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献