Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health
-
Published:2021-06
Issue:6
Volume:6
Page:e006045
-
ISSN:2059-7908
-
Container-title:BMJ Global Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMJ Glob Health
Author:
Briggs Andrew MORCID, Huckel Schneider CarmenORCID, Slater HelenORCID, Jordan Joanne EORCID, Parambath SarikaORCID, Young James JORCID, Sharma SaurabORCID, Kopansky-Giles DeborahORCID, Mishrra SwateeORCID, Akesson Kristina EORCID, Ali NuzhatORCID, Belton JolettaORCID, Betteridge NeilORCID, Blyth Fiona MORCID, Brown RichardORCID, Debere DemelashORCID, Dreinhöfer Karsten EORCID, Finucane LauraORCID, Foster Helen EORCID, Gimigliano FrancescaORCID, Haldeman ScottORCID, Haq Syed AORCID, Horgan BenORCID, Jain AnilORCID, Joshipura ManjulORCID, Kalla Asgar AORCID, Lothe JakobORCID, Matsuda ShuichiORCID, Mobasheri AliORCID, Mwaniki LillianORCID, Nordin Margareta CORCID, Pattison MarilynORCID, Reis Felipe J JORCID, Soriano Enrique RORCID, Tick HeatherORCID, Waddell JamesORCID, Wiek DieterORCID, Woolf Anthony DORCID, March LynORCID
Abstract
IntroductionDespite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health.MethodsDesign: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1–2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions.ResultsPhase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening.ConclusionAn empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.
Funder
University of Sydney Bone and Joint Decade Foundation Curtin University of Technology
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference99 articles.
1. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019;Cieza;Lancet,2021 2. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019;Vos;The Lancet,2020 3. The global burden of musculoskeletal pain-where to from here?;Blyth;Am J Public Health,2019 4. Organisation for Economic and Co-operation Development . Health spending: expenditure by disease, age and gender. Paris: OECD, 2016. 5. US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|