Living labs for migrant health research: the challenge of cocreating research with migrant population and policy makers

Author:

Giménez Laura,Evangelidou Stella,Gresle Anne-Sophie,de la Torre Leonardo,Ubalde-López Mònica,Recasens Oriol,Muñoz Eva,Pinazo Maria Jesus,Requena-Méndez AnaORCID

Abstract

The need for the public to take an active role in scientific research is becoming increasingly important, particularly in health-related research. However, the coexistence and alignment of scientific and citizen interests, needs, knowledge and timing is not straightforward, especially when involving migrant populations. To conduct impactful research, it becomes also essential to consider the perspectives of policymakers, thereby adding a layer of complexity to the processes.In this article we address the experience of a living lab created in a research institution and supported by the city council and a local foundation, in which we developed three experiences of patient and public involvement (PPI): (1) accessing to comprehensive care for people at risk of Chagas disease; (2) strategies towards improving access and quality of mental healthcare services in migrants; (3) promoting healthy and safe school environments in vulnerable urban settings.These three challenges provided an opportunity to delve into diverse strategies for involving key stakeholders, including migrant populations, expert researchers and political actors in health research. This article offers insights into the successes, challenges, and valuable lessons learnt from these endeavours, providing a vision that can be beneficial for future initiatives. Each living lab experience crafted its unique governance system and agenda tailored to specific challenge scenarios, giving rise to diverse methods and study designs.We have found that the management of the cocreation of the research question and the institutional support are key to building robust PPI processes with migrant groups.

Funder

Caixa Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Reference34 articles.

1. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities;Brett;Pat,2014

2. Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members;Jackson;BMC Med,2020

3. Wright MT , Brito I , Cook T , et al . What is participatory health research? Berlin, 2013.

4. Vaughn LM , Jacquez F . Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process. J Particip Res Methods 2020;1. doi:10.35844/001c.13244

5. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research;Manafo;Health Res Policy Syst,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3