Abstract
IntroductionDespite growing scholarship on the social determinants of health (SDoH), wider action remains in its early stages. Broad public understanding of SDoH can help catalyse such action. This paper aimed to document public perception of what matters for health from countries with broad geographic, cultural, linguistic, population composition, language and income level variation.MethodsWe conducted an online survey in Brazil, China, Germany, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria and the USA to assess rankings of what respondents thought matters for health and what they perceived decision makers think matters for health. We analysed the percentages of each determinant rated as the most important for good health using two metrics: the top selection and a composite of the top three selections. We used two-tailed χ2 test for significance testing between groups.ResultsOf 8753 respondents, 56.2% (95% CI 55.1% to 57.2%) ranked healthcare as the most important determinant of good health using the composite metric. This ranking was consistent across countries except in China where it appeared second. While genetics was cited as the most important determinant by 22.3% (95% CI 21.5% to 23.2%) of the overall sample with comparable rates in most countries, the percentage increased to 33.3% (95% CI 30.5% to 36.3%) in Germany and 35.9% (95% CI 33.0% to 38.8%) in the USA. Politics was the determinant with the greatest absolute difference (18.5%, 95% CI 17.3% to 19.6%) between what respondents considered matters for health versus what they perceived decision makers think matters for health.ConclusionThe majority of people consider healthcare the most important determinant of health, well above other social determinants. This highlights the need for more investment in communication efforts around the importance of SDoH.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference38 articles.
1. Smedley BD , Syme SL , Health I of M (US) C on C on SS and BR to I the P . The contribution of social and behavioral research to an understanding of the distribution of disease: a multilevel approach, 2000. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222836/ [Accessed 22 Nov 2020].
2. Producing health, consuming health care
3. Dahlgren G , Whitehead M . Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. 69, 2007.
4. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health - Final report of the commission on social determinants of health. Available: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1 [Accessed 15 Jun 2021].
5. Social medicine in Latin America: productivity and dangers facing the major national groups
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献