What matters for health? Public views from eight countries

Author:

Abdalla Salma MORCID,Hernandez Mark,Fazaludeen Koya ShaffiORCID,Rosenberg Samuel BORCID,Robbins Grace,Magana Laura,Nsoesie Elaine OkanyeneORCID,Sabin Lora,Galea Sandro

Abstract

IntroductionDespite growing scholarship on the social determinants of health (SDoH), wider action remains in its early stages. Broad public understanding of SDoH can help catalyse such action. This paper aimed to document public perception of what matters for health from countries with broad geographic, cultural, linguistic, population composition, language and income level variation.MethodsWe conducted an online survey in Brazil, China, Germany, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria and the USA to assess rankings of what respondents thought matters for health and what they perceived decision makers think matters for health. We analysed the percentages of each determinant rated as the most important for good health using two metrics: the top selection and a composite of the top three selections. We used two-tailed χ2 test for significance testing between groups.ResultsOf 8753 respondents, 56.2% (95% CI 55.1% to 57.2%) ranked healthcare as the most important determinant of good health using the composite metric. This ranking was consistent across countries except in China where it appeared second. While genetics was cited as the most important determinant by 22.3% (95% CI 21.5% to 23.2%) of the overall sample with comparable rates in most countries, the percentage increased to 33.3% (95% CI 30.5% to 36.3%) in Germany and 35.9% (95% CI 33.0% to 38.8%) in the USA. Politics was the determinant with the greatest absolute difference (18.5%, 95% CI 17.3% to 19.6%) between what respondents considered matters for health versus what they perceived decision makers think matters for health.ConclusionThe majority of people consider healthcare the most important determinant of health, well above other social determinants. This highlights the need for more investment in communication efforts around the importance of SDoH.

Funder

Rockefeller Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference38 articles.

1. Smedley BD , Syme SL , Health I of M (US) C on C on SS and BR to I the P . The contribution of social and behavioral research to an understanding of the distribution of disease: a multilevel approach, 2000. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222836/ [Accessed 22 Nov 2020].

2. Producing health, consuming health care

3. Dahlgren G , Whitehead M . Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. 69, 2007.

4. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health - Final report of the commission on social determinants of health. Available: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1 [Accessed 15 Jun 2021].

5. Social medicine in Latin America: productivity and dangers facing the major national groups

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3