National and subnational governance and decision-making processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: an empirical analysis

Author:

Mukherjee SanjanaORCID,Asthana SumeghaORCID,Ukponu Winifred,Ihueze Adachioma C,Gobir Ibrahim B,Phelan Alexandra LORCID,Standley Claire JORCID

Abstract

Governance of the COVID-19 pandemic required decision-makers to make and implement decisions amidst uncertainty, public pressure and time constraints. However, few studies have attempted to assess these decision-making processes empirically during health emergencies. Thus, we aimed to understand governance, defined as the process of decision-making and implementation of decisions, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. We conducted key informant interviews and focus group discussions with national and subnational government officials, civil society organisation (CSO) members, development partners and academic experts. Our study identified several themes on governance and decision-making processes. First, Nigeria established high-level decision-making structures at the federal and state levels, providing clear and integrated multisectoral decision-making mechanism. However, due to the emergence of conflicts between government levels, there is a need to strengthen intergovernmental arrangements. Second, while decision-makers relied on input from academic experts and CSOs, additional efforts are required to engage such stakeholders in decision-making processes, especially during the early stages of health emergencies. Third, Nigeria’s previous experiences responding to disease outbreaks aided the overall response, as many capacities and coordination mechanisms for cohesive action were present. Fourth, while decision-makers took a holistic view of scientific, social and economic factors for decision-making, this process was also adaptive to account for rapidly evolving information. Lastly, more efforts are needed to ensure decisions are inclusive, equitable and transparent, and improve overall public trust in governance processes. This study provides insights and identifies opportunities to enhance governance and decision-making processes in health emergency responses, aiding future pandemic preparedness efforts.

Funder

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference53 articles.

1. United Nations economic and social Commission for Asia and the Pacific . What is good governance? [Internet]. Available: https://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance

2. Parker AM , Nelson C , Shelton SR , et al . Measuring crisis decision making for public health emergencies [Internet]. RAND Corporation; 2009. Available: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR712.html

3. The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems;Ansell;Public Management Review,2021

4. The World Bank . Governance & institutions COVID-19 response resources [Internet]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/governance-institutions-covid-19-response-resources

5. Phelan AL , Katz R . Governance preparedness: initial lessons from COVID-19. Background report commissioned by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board; Available: https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/governance-preparedness-initial-lessons-from-covid-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3