Abortion-related morbidity in six Latin American and Caribbean countries: findings of the WHO/HRP multi-country survey on abortion (MCS-A)

Author:

Romero Mariana,Gomez Ponce de Leon Rodolfo,Baccaro Luiz Francisco,Carroli Berenise,Mehrtash Hedieh,Randolino Jimena,Menjivar Elisa,Estevez Saint-Hilaire Erika,Huatuco Maria del Pilar,Hernandez Muñoz Rosalinda,Garcia Camacho Gabriela,Thwin Soe Soe,Campodonico Liana,Abalos Edgardo,Giordano Daniel,Gamerro Hugo,Kim Caron Rahn,Ganatra Bela,Gülmezoglu Metin,Tuncalp Özge,Carroli Guillermo

Abstract

IntroductionAbortion-related complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women in many Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. The objective of this study was to characterise abortion-related complication severity, describe the management of these complications and report women’s experiences with abortion care in selected countries of the Americas region.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study of 70 health facilities across six countries in the region. We collected data on women’s characteristics including socio-demographics, obstetric history, clinical information, management procedures and using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (ACASI) survey the experience of abortion care. Descriptive bivariate analysis was performed for women’s characteristics, management of complications and reported experiences of abortion care by severity of complications, organised in five hierarchical mutually exclusive categories based on indicators present at assessment. Generalised linear estimation models were used to assess the association between women’s characteristics and severity of complications.ResultsWe collected data on 7983 women with abortion-related complications. Complications were classified as mild (46.3%), moderate (49.5%), potentially life-threatening (3.1%), near-miss cases (1.1%) and deaths (0.2%). Being single, having a gestational age of ≥13 weeks and having expelled products of conception before arrival at the facility were significantly associated with experiencing severe maternal outcomes compared with mild complications.Management of abortion-related complications included both uterotonics and uterine evacuation for two-thirds of the women while one-third received uterine evacuation only. Surgical uterine evacuation was performed in 93.2% (7437/7983) of women, being vacuum aspiration the most common one (5007/7437, 67.4%).Of the 327 women who completed the ACASI survey, 16.5% reported having an induced abortion, 12.5% of the women stated that they were not given explanations regarding their care nor were able to ask questions during their examination and treatment with percentages increasing with the severity of morbidity.ConclusionsThis is one of the first studies using a standardised methodology to measure severity of abortion-related complications and women’s experiences with abortion care in LAC. Results aim to inform policies and programmes addressing sexual and reproductive rights and health in the region.

Funder

Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019;Bearak;Lancet Glob Health,2020

2. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model

3. World Health Organization . Maternal health and safe motherhood programme. the prevention and management of unsafe abortion: report of a technical Working Group (WHO/MSM/92.5). Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.

4. Facility‐based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries

5. World Health Organization . Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3