Abstract
BackgroundLow/middle-income countries (LMICs) face triple burden of malnutrition associated with infectious diseases, and non-communicable diseases. This review aims to synthesise the available data on the delivery, coverage, and effectiveness of the nutrition programmes for conflict affected women and children living in LMICs.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases and grey literature using terms related to conflict, population, and nutrition. We searched studies on women and children receiving nutrition-specific interventions during or within five years of a conflict in LMICs. We extracted information on population, intervention, and delivery characteristics, as well as delivery barriers and facilitators. Data on intervention coverage and effectiveness were tabulated, but no meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsNinety-one pubblications met our inclusion criteria. Nearly half of the publications (n=43) included population of sub-Saharan Africa (n=31) followed by Middle East and North African region. Most publications (n=58) reported on interventions targeting children under 5 years of age, and pregnant and lactating women (n=27). General food distribution (n=34), micronutrient supplementation (n=27) and nutrition assessment (n=26) were the most frequently reported interventions, with most reporting on intervention delivery to refugee populations in camp settings (n=63) and using community-based approaches. Only eight studies reported on coverage and effectiveness of intervention. Key delivery facilitators included community advocacy and social mobilisation, effective monitoring and the integration of nutrition, and other sectoral interventions and services, and barriers included insufficient resources, nutritional commodity shortages, security concerns, poor reporting, limited cooperation, and difficulty accessing and following-up of beneficiaries.DiscussionDespite the focus on nutrition in conflict settings, our review highlights important information gaps. Moreover, there is very little information on coverage or effectiveness of nutrition interventions; more rigorous evaluation of effectiveness and delivery approaches is needed, including outside of camps and for preventive as well as curative nutrition interventions.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019125221.
Funder
International Development Research Centre
UNICEF
Family Larsson Rosenquist Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference114 articles.
1. Ploughshares P . Armed conflict 2016, 2018. Available: http://ploughshares.ca/armed-conflict/defining-armed-conflict/
2. The Quality of Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research
3. World Health Organization . Communicable diseases and severe food shortage: who technical note, October 2010: World Health organization, 2010. Available: https://www.usaid.gov/global-health/health-areas/nutrition/technical-areas/nutrition-emergencies-technical-guidance-brief
4. OCHA . Global humanitarian overview United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affair; 2018. https://www.unocha.org/publication/global-humanitarian-overview/global-humanitarian-overview-2018 [Accessed 13 July 2019].
5. UNICEF . UNICEF’s approach to scaling up nutrition United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). New York United Nations Children’s Fund; 2015. https://sites.unicef.org/nutrition/files/Unicef_Nutrition_Strategy.pdf [Accessed 20 August 2019].