Abstract
IntroductionUniversal healthcare services funded through taxation and free at point-of-access are the most equitable ways of funding healthcare rights. This paper examines key public sector health financing measures in 17 East and Southern African (ESA) countries, estimates the funding gap for basic and comprehensive services and relates this to sources of lost tax revenue.MethodsHealth financing and tax data for 2018 (the most recent year available) were extracted from international databases for each ESA country, and analysed collectively for the region, comparing against intergovernmental estimates of optimal funding and tax capacity. Despite limitations noted, the scale of the health financing gap and tax losses informed policy recommendations.ResultsThe annual average per capita financing gap ranged from $28 to $84 for basic to comprehensive services, respectively, applying estimates of funding needs. Many innovative financing measures being explored do not meet this scale of deficit. Annual ESA per capita tax losses were estimated as: US$34.20 from shortfalls in domestic tax capacity and US$13.80 from illicit financial flows largely due to commercial practices. A proposed 25% minimum effective tax rate on multinationals in a fairer global tax system would yield an additional annual collection US$26.20 in the region.ConclusionsAddressing a total annual tax loss of US$34 billion from these three sources alone would almost completely finance the region’s US$36 billion financing gap for a comprehensive public sector health system. The COVID-19 pandemic’s exposure of the need for investment in public sector services suggests an opportunity for an alliance between health and finance sectors to ensure progressive taxation as the core funding for an equitable, universal health system. This implies costing the health funding demands and gap in ESA countries; strengthening domestic tax capacity, expanding wealth taxes, curbing illicit outflows and providing health evidence to ongoing African diplomacy for a fairer global tax system.
Funder
Open Society Policy Centre
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference49 articles.
1. Lethbridge J . World Bank undermines right to universal healthcare [Bretton Woods Project]. 2017. Available: https://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/04/world-bank-undermines-right-universal-healthcare/ [Accessed 10 Sep 2022].
2. The failure of private health services: COVID-19 induced crises in low- and middle-income country health systems;David Williams;Glob Public Health,2021
3. International Finance Corporation (IFC) . The business of health in Africa: partnering with the private sector to improve people’s lives. Washington DC IFC; 2016. Available: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2016-01/IFC_HealthinAfrica_Final_0.pdf [Accessed 10 Sep 2022].
4. Loewenson R , Godt S , Chanda-Kapata P . Asserting public health interest in acting on commercial determinants of health in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from a discourse analysis. BMJ Global Health 2022;7:e009271. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009271
5. Doherty J . Expansion of the private health sector in East and Southern Africa. EQUINET Discussion Paper 87. Harare EQUINET; 2011.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献