Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries

Author:

Seward NadineORCID,Hanlon CharlotteORCID,Murdoch JamieORCID,Colbourn TimORCID,Prince Martin JamesORCID,Venkatapuram SridharORCID,Sevdalis Nick

Abstract

The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of context on the ability to effectively deliver evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, IR for global health is failing to apply a robust, theoretically driven approach, leading to ethical concerns associated with research that is not methodologically sound.Inappropriate methods are often used in IR to address and report on context. This may result in a lack in understanding of how to effectively adapt the intervention to the new setting and a lack of clarity in conceptualising whether there is sufficient evidence to generalise findings from previous IR to a new setting, or if a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed. Some of the ethical issues arising from this shortcoming include poor-quality research that may needlessly expose vulnerable participants to research that has not been adapted to suit local needs and priorities, and the inappropriate use of RCTs that denies participants in the control arm access to treatment that is effective within the local context.To address these concerns, we propose a complementary approach to clinical equipoise for IR, known as contextual equipoise. We discuss challenges in the evaluation of context and also with assessing the certainty of evidence to justify an RCT. Finally, we describe methods that can be applied to improve the evaluation and reporting of context and to help understand if contextual equipoise can be justified or if significant adaptations are required. We hope our analysis offers helpful insight to better understand and ensure that the ethical principle of beneficence is upheld in the real-world contexts of IR in low-resource settings.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference46 articles.

1. United Nations . Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, 2015. Available: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

2. Implementing innovations in global women's, children's, and adolescents' health: Realizing the potential for implementation science;Peterson;Obstet Gynecol,2018

3. World Health Organization . Ethics in implementation research. Facilitator’s guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325608/9789241515375-eng.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed Dec 2019].

4. Republished research: Implementation research: what it is and how to do it

5. Powell B , Thomas W , Matthew C . A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. 10, 2015.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3