Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study

Published:2015-09 Issue:9 Volume:5 Page:e007961
ISSN:2044-6055
Container-title:BMJ Open
language:en
Short-container-title:BMJ Open

Author:

van Lent Marlies,IntHout Joanna,Out Henk Jan

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. 2013. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

2. Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials;Patel;BMC Med,2014

3. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?;Black;JAMA,1998

4. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial;Schroter;BMJ,2004

5. What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?;Schroter;J R Soc Med,2008

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Publishing in Hospitality and Tourism Journals;Tourism;2024-05-13

2. Revision and academic impact: A case study of bioRxiv preprint papers;Journal of Informetrics;2024-02

3. Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts;Scientometrics;2022-04-09

4. No study is ever flawless: A scoping review of common errors in biomedical manuscripts;Accountability in Research;2021-06-26

5. Transparency and replication in alcohol research;The Handbook of Alcohol Use;2021