Who gets referred for knee or hip replacement? A theoretical model of the potential impact of evidence-based referral thresholds using data from a retrospective review of clinic records from an English musculoskeletal referral hub

Author:

Dakin Helen AORCID,Eibich PeterORCID,Gray AlastairORCID,Smith James,Barker Karen L,Beard David,Price Andrew JORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo estimate the relationship between patient characteristics and referral decisions made by musculoskeletal hubs, and to assess the possible impact of an evidence-based referral tool.DesignRetrospective analysis of medical records and decision tree model evaluating policy changes using local and national data.SettingOne musculoskeletal interface clinic (hub) in England.Participants922 adults aged ≥50 years referred by general practitioners with symptoms of knee or hip osteoarthritis.InterventionsWe assessed the current frequency and determinants of referrals from one hub and the change in referrals that would occur at this centre and nationally if evidence-based thresholds for referral (Oxford Knee and Hip Scores, OKS/OHS) were introduced.Main outcome measureOKS/OHS, referrals for surgical assessment, referrals for arthroplasty, costs and quality-adjusted life years.ResultsOf 110 patients with knee symptoms attending face-to-face hub consultations, 49 (45%) were referred for surgical assessment; the mean OKS for these 49 patients was 18 (range: 1–41). Of 101 hip patients, 36 (36%) were referred for surgical assessment (mean OHS: 21, range: 5–44). No patients referred for surgical assessment were above previously reported economic thresholds for OKS (43) or OHS (45). Setting thresholds of OKS ≤31 and OHS ≤35 might have resulted in an additional 22 knee referrals and 26 hip referrals in our cohort. Extrapolating hub results across England suggests a possible increase in referrals nationally, of around 13 000 additional knee replacements and 4500 additional hip replacements each year.ConclusionsMusculoskeletal hubs currently consider OKS/OHS and other factors when making decisions about referral to secondary care for joint replacement. Those referred typically have low OHS/OKS, and introducing evidence-based OKS/OHS thresholds would prevent few inappropriate (high-functioning, low-pain) referrals. However, our findings suggest that some patients not currently referred could benefit from arthroplasty based on OKS/OHS. More research is required to explore other important patient characteristics currently influencing hub decisions.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. The Royal College of Surgeons of England . Is access to surgery a postcode lottery? 2014. Available: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news-and-events/media-centre/press-releases/many-ccgs-are-ignoring-clinical-evidence-in-their-surgical-commissioning-policies/ [Accessed 8 Nov 2016].

2. Harrogate and Rural District Clinical Commissioning Group . Clinical thresholds: hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (only), 2014. Available: http://www.harrogateandruraldistrictccg.nhs.uk/data/uploads/rss2/hip-and-knee-arthroplasty.pdf [Accessed 8 Nov 2016].

3. Scarborough and Ryedale Clinical Commissioning Group . Hip replacement pathway, 2015. Available: http://www.scarboroughryedaleccg.nhs.uk/data/uploads/rss2/orthopaedics/hip-replacement-march-2015.pdf [Accessed 8 Nov 2016].

4. Price A , Kang S , Cook J , et al . The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee replacement: Part 1 – the development of an evidence based model linking pre-operative score to the probability of gaining benefit from surgery. The Bone and Joint Journal 2020;102-B.doi:10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-0102.R2

5. Dakin H , Eibich P , Beard D , et al . The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee replacement: Part 2 – a cost-effectiveness analysis. The Bone and Joint Journal 2020;102-B.doi:10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-0105.R2

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3