CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers

Author:

Marshall Emily GardORCID,Breton MylaineORCID,Green Michael,Edwards Lynn,Ayn CaitlynORCID,Smithman Mélanie Ann,Ryan Carson Shannon,Ashcroft RachelleORCID,Bayoumi Imaan,Burge Frederick,Deslauriers Véronique,Lawson Beverley,Mathews Maria,McPherson Charmaine,Moritz Lauren R,Nesto Sue,Stock David,Wong Sabrina T,Andrew Melissa

Abstract

IntroductionAccess to a primary care provider is a key component of high-functioning healthcare systems. In Canada, 15% of patients do not have a regular primary care provider and are classified as ‘unattached’. In an effort to link unattached patients with a provider, seven Canadian provinces implemented centralised waitlists (CWLs). The effectiveness of CWLs in attaching patients to regular primary care providers is unknown. Factors influencing CWLs effectiveness, particularly across jurisdictional contexts, have yet to be confirmed.Methods and analysisA mixed methods case study will be conducted across three Canadian provinces: Ontario, Québec and Nova Scotia. Quantitatively, CWL data will be linked to administrative and provider billing data to assess the rates of patient attachment over time and delay of attachment, stratified by demographics and compared with select indicators of health service utilisation. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with policymakers, patients, and primary care providers to elicit narratives regarding the administration, use, and access of CWLs. An analysis of policy documents will be used to identify contextual factors affecting CWL effectiveness. Stakeholder dialogues will be facilitated to uncover causal pathways and identify strategies for improving patient attachment to primary care.Ethics and disseminationApproval to conduct this study has been granted in Ontario (Queens University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file number 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol number 40335), Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, project number 2020–3446) and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file number 1024979).

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference66 articles.

1. Toward Higher-Performance Health Systems: Adults' Health Care Experiences In Seven Countries, 2007

2. Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health

3. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications

4. Romanow RJ . Building on values: the future of health care in Canada, 2002.

5. Clair M . Les solutions émergentes: Rapport et recommandations. Commission d’étude sur les Services de Santé et les Services sociaux. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, 2001.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3