How effective is topical miconazole or amorolfine for mild to moderately severe onychomycosis in primary care: the Onycho Trial – a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Author:

Watjer Roeland MORCID,Bonten Tobias NORCID,Sayed Khisraw,Quint Koen D,van der Beek Martha T,Mertens Bart J A,Numans Mattijs E,Eekhof Just A H

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of topical miconazole or amorolfine compared to placebo for mild to moderately severe onychomycosis.DesignRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, with computer-generated treatment allocation at a 1:1:1 ratio.SettingPrimary care, recruitment from February 2020 to August 2022.Participants193 patients with suspected mild to moderately severe onychomycosis were recruited via general practices and from the general public, 111 of whom met the study criteria. The mean age of participants was 51 (SD 13.1), 51% were female and onychomycosis was moderately severe (mean OSI 12.1 (SD 8.0)).InterventionsOnce-daily miconazole 20 mg/g or once-weekly amorolfine 5% nail lacquer solution was compared with placebo (denatonium benzoate solution).Main outcome measuresComplete, clinical and mycological cure at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were clinical improvement, symptom burden, quality of life, adverse effects, compliance, patient-perceived improvement and treatment acceptability.ResultsBased on intention-to-treat analysis, none of the participants receiving miconazole or amorolfine reached complete cure compared with two in the placebo group (OR not estimable (n.e.), p=0.493 and OR n.e., p=0.240, respectively). There was no evidence of a significant difference between groups regarding clinical cure (OR n.e., p=0.493 and OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.45, p=0.615) while miconazole and amorolfine were less effective than placebo at reaching both mycological cure (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.98, p=0.037 and OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.92, p=0.029, respectively) and clinical improvement (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.91, p=0.028 and OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.85, p=0.021, respectively). There was no evidence of a significant difference in disease burden, quality of life, adverse reactions, compliance, patient-perceived improvement or treatment acceptability.ConclusionsTopical miconazole and amorolfine were not effective in achieving a complete, clinical or mycological cure of mild to moderately severe onychomycosis, nor did they significantly alleviate the severity or symptom burden. These treatments should, therefore, not be advised as monotherapy to treat onychomycosis.Trial registration numberWHO ICTRP NL8193.

Funder

Fonds Alledaagse Ziekten

Publisher

BMJ

Reference46 articles.

1. The prevalence of Onychomycosis in the global population - A literature study;Sigurgeirsson;Acad Dermatol Venereol,2014

2. Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients visiting physicians’ offices: A multicenter Canadian survey of 15,000 patients

3. Onychomycosis clinical overview and diagnosis;Lipner;J Am Acad Dermatol,2019

4. NHG-Standaard Dermatomycosen

5. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap . NHG-Standaard Dermatomycosen (Derde Herziening). 3rd edn. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3