Abstract
ObjectiveThere is a lack of longitudinal population-based research comparing women’s experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from the Mothers’ and Young People’s Study, the prevalence of physical and emotional IPV in the first year of the pandemic is compared with earlier waves of data.DesignA prospective pregnancy cohort of first-time mothers in Melbourne, Australia was followed up over the first decade of motherhood, with a quick response study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. 422 women completed the primary exposure measure (IPV; Composite Abuse Scale) in the 1st, 4th and 10th year postpartum and the additional pandemic survey (June 2020–April 2021).Outcome measuresDepressive symptoms; anxiety symptoms; IPV disclosure to a doctor, friends or family, or someone else.ResultsMaternal report of emotional IPV alone was higher during the pandemic (14.4%, 95% CI 11.4% to 18.2%) than in the 10th (9.5%, 95% CI 7.0% to 12.7%), 4th (9.2%, 95% CI 6.8% to 12.4%) and 1st year after the birth of their first child (5.9%, 95% CI 4.0% to 8.6%). Conversely, physical IPV was lowest during the pandemic (3.1%, 95% CI 1.8% to 5.0%). Of women experiencing IPV during the pandemic: 29.7% were reporting IPV for the first time, 52.7% reported concurrent depressive symptoms and just 6.8% had told their doctor.ConclusionsFindings suggest that the spike in IPV-related crime statistics following the onset of the pandemic (typically incidents of physical violence) is the tip of the iceberg for women’s IPV experiences. There is a need to increase the capacity of health practitioners to recognise emotional as well as physical IPV, and IPV ought to be considered where women present with mental health problems.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Oak Foundation
Reference59 articles.
1. Women U . Women U.N.Raises awareness of the shadow pandemic of violence against women during COVID-19. UN, Editor. 2020.
2. Lockdown Stats Melbourne . Days in Lockdown since the pandemic began. 2021. Available: https://lockdownstats.melbourne/ [Accessed 2023].
3. Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19
4. Johns Hopkins University & Medicine . Maps and trends: mortality analyses. 2023. Available: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
5. Health, A.I.o. and Welfare . The first year of COVID-19 in Australia: direct and indirect health effects. Canberra: AIHW, 2021.