Sex and gender-based analysis and diversity metric reporting in acute care trials published in high-impact journals: a systematic review

Author:

Granton DavidORCID,Rodrigues MyancaORCID,Raparelli Valeria,Honarmand Kimia,Agarwal ArnavORCID,Friedrich Jan O,Perna Benedetta,Spaggiari Riccardo,Fortunato Valeria,Risdonne Gianluca,Kho MichelleORCID,VanderKaay Sandra,Chaudhuri Dipayan,Gomez-Builes Carolina,D'Aragon Frédérick,Wiseman Daniel,Lau Vincent IssacORCID,Lin Celina,Reid Julie,Trivedi Vatsal,Prakash Varuna,Belley-Cote EmilieORCID,Al Mandhari Maha,Thabane LehanaORCID,Pilote LouiseORCID,Burns Karen E A

Abstract

ObjectiveTo characterise sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) and diversity metric reporting, representation of female/women participants in acute care trials and temporal changes in reporting before and after publication of the 2016 Sex and Gender Equity in Research guideline.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesWe searched MEDLINE for trials published in five leading medical journals in 2014, 2018 and 2020.Study selectionTrials that enrolled acutely ill adults, compared two or more interventions and reported at least one clinical outcome.Data abstraction and synthesis4 reviewers screened citations and 22 reviewers abstracted data, in duplicate. We compared reporting differences between intensive care unit (ICU) and cardiology trials.ResultsWe included 88 trials (75 (85.2%) ICU and 13 (14.8%) cardiology) (n=111 428; 38 140 (34.2%) females/women). Of 23 (26.1%) trials that reported an SGBA, most used a forest plot (22 (95.7%)), were prespecified (21 (91.3%)) and reported a sex-by-intervention interaction with a significance test (19 (82.6%)). Discordant sex and gender terminology were found between headings and subheadings within baseline characteristics tables (17/32 (53.1%)) and between baseline characteristics tables and SGBA (4/23 (17.4%)). Only 25 acute care trials (28.4%) reported race or ethnicity. Participants were predominantly white (78.8%) and male/men (65.8%). No trial reported gendered-social factors. SGBA reporting and female/women representation did not improve temporally. Compared with ICU trials, cardiology trials reported significantly more SGBA (15/75 (20%) vs 8/13 (61.5%) p=0.005).ConclusionsAcute care trials in leading medical journals infrequently included SGBA, female/women and non-white trial participants, reported race or ethnicity and never reported gender-related factors. Substantial opportunity exists to improve SGBA and diversity metric reporting and recruitment of female/women participants in acute care trials.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022282565.

Funder

American Thoracic Society Recognition Award for Scientific Achievement

Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Studentship Award

Physician Services Incorporated Mid-Career Research Award

Ontario Graduate Scholarship

National New Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

AFP Clinician Educator Early Career Award

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Health Systems Impact Post-Doctoral Fellowship award

Fond de recherche du Quebec-Sante

Critical Care Trials Group trainee travel award

Canada Research Chair in Critical Care Rehabilitation and Knowledge Translation

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care-Clinician Investigator Program

CIHR Health Systems Impact Fellowship

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine at the University of Toronto

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3