Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol

Author:

Musa Massirfufulay KpeheORCID,Akdur GizdemORCID,Hanratty BarbaraORCID,Kelly SarahORCID,Gordon AdamORCID,Peryer GuyORCID,Spilsbury KarenORCID,Killett Anne,Burton JenniferORCID,Meyer Julienne,Fortescue Sue,Towers Ann-MarieORCID,Irvine LisaORCID,Goodman ClaireORCID

Abstract

IntroductionCare homes provide nursing and social care for older people who can no longer live independently at home. In the UK, there is no consistent approach to how information about residents’ medical history, care needs and preferences are collected and shared. This limits opportunities to understand the care home population, have a systematic approach to assessment and documentation of care, identifiy care home residents at risk of deterioration and review care. Countries with standardised approaches to residents’ assessment, care planning and review (eg, minimum data sets (MDS)) use the data to understand the care home population, guide resource allocation, monitor services delivery and for research. The aim of this realist review is to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care of individual residents.Methods and analysisA realist review will be conducted in three research stages.Stage 1 will scope the literature and develop candidate programme theories of what ensures effective uptake and sustained implementation of an MDS.Stage2 will test and refine these theories through further iterative searches of the evidence from the literature to establish how effective uptake of an MDS can be achieved.Stage 3 will consult with relevant stakeholders to test or refine the programme theory (theories) of how an MDS works at the resident level of care for different stakeholders and in what circumstances. Data synthesis will use realist logic to align data from each eligible article with possible context–mechanism–outcome configurations or specific elements that answer the research questions.Ethics and disseminationThe University of Hertfordshire Ethics Committee has approved this study (HSK/SF/UH/04169). Findings will be disseminated through briefings with stakeholders, conference presentations, a national consultation on the use of an MDS in UK long-term care settings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and in print and social media publications accessible to residents, relatives and care home staff.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020171323; this review protocol is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. Age UK . Later life in the United Kingdom 2019, 2019. Available: https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/later_life_uk_factsheet.pdf [Accessed 08 May 2020].

2. Forecasting the care needs of the older population in England over the next 20 years: estimates from the population ageing and care simulation (PACSim) modelling study;Kingston;Lancet Public Health,2018

3. Kelly A , Kenny C . This POSTnote looks at the numbers of unpaid carers across the UK, and the amount and type of care provided. It examines the impacts of providing unpaid care on carers’ education, employment, finances, health and wellbeing, and personal and social relationships. The note reviews the different types of support available for carers and examines evidence on their effectiveness, 2018. Available: https://post.parliament.uk/research-briefings/post-pn-0582/ [Accessed 08 May 2020].

4. Care Quality Commission (CQC) . The state of health care and adult social care in England 2016/17, 2017. Available: https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20171011_stateofcare1617_summary.pdf [Accessed 15 Jan 2020].

5. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence on the duration of protection by bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination against tuberculosis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3