External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study

Author:

Mörelius EvalotteORCID,Olsson EmmaORCID,Sahlén Helmer Charlotte,Thernström Blomqvist Ylva,Angelhoff CharlotteORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesPerforming randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal intensive care is challenging in many ways. While restrictive inclusion criteria or busy study protocols are obvious barriers, external barriers leading to termination of a study are seldom discussed. The aim of this study was to describe barriers for inclusion of families in neonatal intensive care in an RCT aiming to evaluate the effects of continuous skin-to-skin contact on mood and sleep quality in parents of preterm infants, as well as the quality of parent-infant interaction and salivary cortisol concentrations at the time of discharge.DesignA descriptive study.SettingThree out of seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Sweden participated in a two-arm RCT that was terminated because of low inclusion rate.ParticipantsBefore termination of the study, 11 out of 242 families assessed for eligibility were included for participation.ResultsThe major barriers for inclusion in this RCT were external due to (1) lack of intensive care beds in the neonatal ward, causing medically stable infants to be transferred back to the referring hospital quicker than expected, (2) moving directly from the delivery room to a family room without passing an open bay intensive care room or (3) transferring from one neonatal ward to another with the same care level to increase availability of intensive care beds where needed. Other barriers were the inclusion criteria ‘single-birth’ and ‘Swedish-speaking parent’.ConclusionsThe major barriers for including participants were external constituted by transferals between neonatal wards and cities due to lack of intensive care beds. This is a multifactorial issue related to organisational structures. However, since this affects the possibilities to perform research this study highlights some suggestions to consider when planning prospective intervention studies within a neonatal setting.Trial registration numberNCT03004677.

Funder

Region Östergötland

Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. WHO . Preterm birth, 2018. Available: http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth [Accessed 1 Nov 2020].

2. Swedish neonatal quality register, SNQR, 2018. Available: https://www.medscinet.com/PNQ/uploads/website/arsrapporter/Neonatalregistrets%20Årsrapport%202018._3.0.pdf2020

3. Association between year of birth and 1-year survival among extremely preterm infants in Sweden during 2004-2007 and 2014-2016;Norman;JAMA,2019

4. Closeness and separation in neonatal intensive care

5. Parent-Infant Closeness, parents' participation, and nursing support in Single-Family room and open Bay NICUs;Tandberg;J Perinat Neonatal Nurs,2018

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3