The (un)availability of prognostic information in the last days of life: a prospective observational study

Author:

White NicolaORCID,Reid Fiona,Harries Priscilla,Harris Adam J L,Minton Ollie,McGowan Catherine,Lodge Philip,Tookman Adrian,Stone Patrick

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aims of this study were (1) to document the clinical condition of patients considered to be in the last 2 weeks of life and (2) to compare patients who did or did not survive for 72 hours.DesignA prospective observational study.SettingTwo sites in London, UK (a hospice and a hospital palliative care team).ParticipantsAny inpatient, over 18 years old, English speaking, who was identified by the palliative care team as at risk of dying within the next 2 weeks was eligible.Outcome measuresPrognostic signs and symptoms were documented at a one off assessment and patients were followed up 7 days later to determine whether or not they had died.ResultsFifty participants were recruited and 24/50 (48%) died within 72 hours of assessment. The most prevalent prognostic features observed were a decrease in oral food intake (60%) and a rapid decline of the participant’s global health status (56%). Participants who died within 72 hours had a lower level of consciousness and had more care needs than those who lived longer. A large portion of data was unavailable, particularly that relating to the psychological and spiritual well-being of the patient, due to the decreased consciousness of the patient.ConclusionsThe prevalence of prognostic signs and symptoms in the final days of life has been documented between those predicted to die and those who did not. How doctors make decisions with missing information is an area for future research, in addition to understanding the best way to use the available information to make more accurate predictions.

Funder

Marie Curie Cancer Care

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Last hours of living

2. The End of Life Care Strategy: Department of Health, ed, 2008.

3. Neuberger J , Guthrie C , Aaronovitch D . More care, less pathway: a review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. In: Department of Health CC, editor, 2013.

4. Parry R , Seymour J , Whittaker B , et al . Rapid evidence review: pathways focused on the dying phase in end of life care and their key components, 2013.

5. Diagnosing dying in the acute hospital setting – are we too late?

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3