Practice patterns among early-career primary care (ECPC) physicians and workforce planning implications: protocol for a mixed methods study

Author:

Lavergne M RuthORCID,Goldsmith Laurie J,Grudniewicz Agnes,Rudoler David,Marshall Emily Gard,Ahuja Megan,Blackie Doug,Burge Fred,Gibson Richard J,Glazier Richard H,Hawrylyshyn Steve,Hedden Lindsay,Hernandez-Lee Jacalynne,Horrey Kathleen,Joyce Mike,Kiran Tara,MacKenzie Adrian,Mathews Maria,McCracken RitaORCID,McGrail Kimberlyn,McKay Madeleine,McPherson Charmaine,Mitra Goldis,Sampalli Tara,Scott Ian,Snadden DavidORCID,Murphy Gail Tomblin,Wong Sabrina T

Abstract

IntroductionCanadians report persistent problems accessing primary care despite an increasing per-capita supply of primary care physicians (PCPs). There is speculation that PCPs, especially those early in their careers, may now be working less and/or choosing to practice in focused clinical areas rather than comprehensive family medicine, but little evidence to support or refute this. The goal of this study is to inform primary care planning by: (1) identifying values and preferences shaping the practice intentions and choices of family medicine residents and early career PCPs, (2) comparing practice patterns of early-career and established PCPs to determine if changes over time reflect cohort effects (attributes unique to the most recent cohort of PCPs) or period effects (changes over time across all PCPs) and (3) integrating findings to understand the dynamics among practice intentions, practice choices and practice patterns and to identify policy implications.Methods and analysisWe plan a mixed-methods study in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia. We will conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with family medicine residents and early-career PCPs and analyse survey data collected by the College of Family Physicians of Canada. We will also analyse linked administrative health data within each province. Mixed methods integration both within the study and as an end-of-study step will inform how practice intentions, choices and patterns are interrelated and inform policy recommendations.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the Simon Fraser University Research Ethics Board with harmonised approval from partner institutions. This study will produce a framework to understand practice choices, new measures for comparing practice patterns across jurisdictions and information necessary for planners to ensure adequate provider supply and patient access to primary care.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference69 articles.

1. Statistics Canada . Table 105-0508 - Canadian health characteristics, annual estimates, by age group and sex, Canada (excluding territories) and provinces, occasional. CANSIM (database) 2016.

2. CIHI . How Canada Compares: Results From the Commonwealth Fund’s 2016 International Health Policy Survey of Adults in 11 Countries. Ottawa, ON: CIHI, 2017.

3. Supply C . Distribution and migration of Canadian physicians. Ottawa, ON: CIHI, 2016.

4. The sorcerer's Apprentices;Evans;Healthc Policy,2011

5. Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) . Physicians in Canada, 2016: summary report. Ottawa: CIHI, 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3