Author:
Guthrie Nicole L,Carpenter Jason,Edwards Katherine L,Appelbaum Kevin J,Dey Sourav,Eisenberg David M,Katz David L,Berman Mark A
Abstract
ObjectivesDevelopment of digital biomarkers to predict treatment response to a digital behavioural intervention.DesignMachine learning using random forest classifiers on data generated through the use of a digital therapeutic which delivers behavioural therapy to treat cardiometabolic disease. Data from 13 explanatory variables (biometric and engagement in nature) generated in the first 28 days of a 12-week intervention were used to train models. Two levels of response to treatment were predicted: (1) systolic change ≥10 mm Hg (SC model), and (2) shift down to a blood pressure category of elevated or better (ER model). Models were validated using leave-one-out cross validation and evaluated using area under the curve receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) and specificity- sensitivity. Ability to predict treatment response with a subset of nine variables, including app use and baseline blood pressure, was also tested (models SC-APP and ER-APP).SettingData generated through ad libitum use of a digital therapeutic in the USA.ParticipantsDeidentified data from 135 adults with a starting blood pressure ≥130/80, who tracked blood pressure for at least 7 weeks using the digital therapeutic.ResultsThe SC model had an AUROC of 0.82 and a sensitivity of 58% at a specificity of 90%. The ER model had an AUROC of 0.69 and a sensitivity of 32% at a specificity at 91%. Dropping explanatory variables related to blood pressure resulted in an AUROC of 0.72 with a sensitivity of 42% at a specificity of 90% for the SC-APP model and an AUROC of 0.53 for the ER-APP model.ConclusionsMachine learning was used to transform data from a digital therapeutic into digital biomarkers that predicted treatment response in individual participants. Digital biomarkers have potential to improve treatment outcomes in a digital behavioural intervention.
Reference44 articles.
1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
2. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion . The power of prevention: chronic disease.the public health challenge of the 21st century. United States: Department of Health and Human Services, 2009.
3. Ford ES , Bergmann MM , Kröger J , et al . Healthy living is the best revenge. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:9.
4. Turner RM , Ma Q , Lorig K , et al . Evaluation of a diabetes self-management program: claims analysis on comorbid illnesses, health care utilization, and cost. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e207.doi:10.2196/jmir.9225
5. Digital medicine's March on chronic disease;Kvedar;Nat Biotechnol,2016
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献