Complaint risk among mental health practitioners compared with physical health practitioners: a retrospective cohort study of complaints to health regulators in Australia

Author:

Veness Benjamin GORCID,Tibble HollyORCID,Grenyer Brin FSORCID,Morris Jennifer M,Spittal Matthew JORCID,Nash Louise,Studdert David M,Bismark Marie MORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo understand complaint risk among mental health practitioners compared with physical health practitioners.DesignRetrospective cohort study, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) to analyse complaint risk and a multivariate regression model to identify predictors of complaints.SettingNational study using complaints data from health regulators in Australia.ParticipantsAll psychiatrists and psychologists (‘mental health practitioners’) and all physicians, optometrists, physiotherapists, osteopaths and chiropractors (‘physical health practitioners’) registered to practice in Australia between 2011 and 2016.Outcome measuresIncidence rates, source and nature of complaints to regulators.ResultsIn total, 7903 complaints were lodged with regulators over the 6-year period. Most complaints were lodged by patients and their families. Mental health practitioners had a complaint rate that was more than twice that of physical health practitioners (complaints per 1000 practice years: psychiatrists 119.1 vs physicians 48.0, p<0.001; psychologists 21.9 vs other allied health 7.5, p<0.001). Their risk of complaints was especially high in relation to reports, records, confidentiality, interpersonal behaviour, sexual boundary breaches and the mental health of the practitioner. Among mental health practitioners, male practitioners (psychiatrists IRR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.85; psychologists IRR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.07) and older practitioners (≥65 years compared with 36–45 years: psychiatrists IRR 2.37, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.89; psychologists IRR 1.78, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.14) were at increased risk of complaints.ConclusionsMental health practitioners were more likely to be the subject of complaints than physical health practitioners. Areas of increased risk are related to professional ethics, communication skills and the health of mental health practitioners themselves. Further research could usefully explore whether addressing these risk factors through training, professional development and practitioner health initiatives may reduce the risk of complaints about mental health practitioners.

Funder

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists

Australian Health Practitioner Research Agency

National Health and Medical Research Council

Australian Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. Doctors disciplined for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2009;Elkin;Med J Aust,2011

2. Disciplinary action against physicians: Who is likely to get disciplined?

3. Predicting risk for disciplinary action by a state Medical board;Cardarelli;Tex Med,2004

4. Alam A , Klemensberg J , Griesman J , et al . The characteristics of physicians disciplined by professional colleges in Canada. Open Med 2011;5:e166.

5. Characteristics Associated With Physician Discipline

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3