Abstract
IntroductionResearch on effectively navigating older adults into primary care is urgently needed. Community–clinic linkage models (CCLMs) aim to improve population health by linking the health and community sectors in order to improve patients’ access to healthcare and, ultimately, population health. However, research on community-based points of entry linking adults with untreated medical needsintothe healthcare sector is nascent. CCLMs implemented for the general adult population are not necessarily accessible to older adults. Given the recency of the CCLM literature and the seeming rarity of CCLM interventions designed for older adults, it is appropriate to employ scoping review methodology in order to generate a comprehensive review of the available information on this topic. This protocol will inform a scoping review that reviews characteristics of community-based programmes that link older adults with the healthcare sector.Methods and analysisThe present protocol was developed as per JBI Evidence Synthesis best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. The proposed scoping review will follow Levac and colleagues’ update to Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology. Healthcare access at the system and individual levels will be operationalised in data extraction and analysis in accordance with Levesque and colleagues’ Conceptual Framework of Access to Health. The protocol complies with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Beginning in August 2023 or later, citation databases (AgeLine (Ebsco); CINAHL Complete; MEDLINE (PubMed); Scopus Advanced (Elsevier); Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest); Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate)) and grey literature (Google; American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings; SIREN Evidence & Resource Library) will be searched.Ethics and disseminationThe authors plan to disseminate their findings in conference proceedings and publication in a peer-reviewed journal and deposit extracted data in the Figshare depository. The study does not require Institutional Review Board approval.Registration detailsProtocol registered in Open Science Framework (DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2EF9D).
Funder
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Institute of Aging
Reference66 articles.
1. Vespa J . The US joins other countries with large aging populations resource library: United States Census Bureau. 2018. Available: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2018/03/graying-america.html
2. Structural racism and health disparities: Reconfiguring the social determinants of health framework to include the root cause;Yearby;J Law Med Ethics,2020
3. Tavares J , Cohen M , Silberman S , et al . Measuring disease cost burden among older adults in the U.S.: A health and retirement study analysis. LeadingAge LTSS Center @ UMass Boston and National Council on Aging 2022.
4. The role of primary care physicians in managing chronic disease;Savoy;Dela J Public Health,2017
5. Thomas KM , Patel AR , Swails JL , et al . Primary care experience among older adults in the United States: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2021;95:S0167-4943(21)00058-3. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104396