Quantitative content analysis of Freedom of Information requests examining the extent and variations of tools and training for conducting suicide risk assessments in NHS Trusts across England

Author:

Fedorowicz SophiaORCID,Dempsey Robert CORCID,Ellis Naomi J,Mulvey Olivia,Gidlow Christopher JORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesDetermining the risk for suicide is a difficult endeavour. Clinical guidance in the UK explicitly advises against using risk assessment tools and scales to determine suicide risk. Based on Freedom of Information (FoI) requests made to NHS Trusts in England, this study provides an overview of suicide risk assessment tools in use, training provided in how to use such assessments, and explores implementation of suicide risk assessment guidance in practice in English NHS Trusts.DesignA cross-sectional survey of suicide risk assessment tools and training gathered via FoI requests and subjected to a content analysis.SettingFoI requests were submitted to NHS Trusts across England.ResultsA wide variety of suicide risk assessments tools were identified as being used in practice, with several trusts reported using more than one tool to determine suicide risk. Forty-one trusts reported using locally developed, unvalidated, tools to assess risk of suicide and 18 stated they do not use a tool. Ten trusts stated they do not train their staff in suicide risk assessment while 13 reported use of specific suicide risk assessment training. Sixty-two trusts stated they do not centrally record the number of assessments conducted or how many individuals are identified as at risk. Content analysis indicated the frequent wider assessment of risk not restricted to suicide risk.ConclusionsThere is wide variation in suicide risk assessment tools being used in practice and some lack of specific training for healthcare staff in determining suicide risk. Few trusts routinely record the number of assessments being conducted or the number of individuals identified at high risk. Implementation of specific training is necessary for the suicide risk assessment process to identify patient needs and develop therapeutic engagement. Routinely recording how many assessments are conducted is a crucial step in improving suicide prevention.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Suicide worldwide in 2019: global health estimates. 2021. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1350975/retrieve

2. United Nations . Goal 3 | Department of economic and social affairs. n.d. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3

3. Office for National Statistics . Suicides in England and Wales. n.d. Available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/suicidesintheunitedkingdom/2019registrations

4. Suicide prediction models: a critical review of recent research with recommendations for the way forward

5. Leavey G , Rosato M , Galway K , et al . Patterns and predictors of help-seeking contacts with health services and general practitioner detection of Suicidality prior to suicide: a cohort analysis of suicides occurring over a two-year period. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16:120. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0824-7

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3